Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026
No Influence of Menstrual Phase on Substrate Oxidation Following Submaximal Aerobic Exercise in the Fed State.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tucker Jessica A L, Bornath Derek P D, McCarthy Seth F, Hazell Tom J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Recently, the influence of the menstrual cycle and, more importantly, fluctuations in key sex hormones across the follicular (FP), ovulation (OP), and luteal (LP) phases have on during-exercise substrate oxidation has been questioned. In addition to a significant amount of work not following best practices when determining menstrual phase, the inter- and intraindividual variability in hormonal concentrations across cycles may be affecting our understanding.
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of three hormonally distinct phases of the menstrual cycle (FP, OP, and LP) on during and postexercise substrate oxidation following an acute bout of submaximal aerobic exercise in the fed state while utilizing best practices to determine menstrual phase.
METHODS: Thirteen females (age: 24 ± 4 yr, body mass index: 24.8 ± 5.4 kg·m -2 , max : 41.02 ± 5.30 mL·kg·min -1 ) completed 30 min of submaximal aerobic exercise in the FP, OP, and LP, where menstrual phase was tracked using cycle counting, oral body temperature, ovulation strips, and blood sampling. Between-phase differences in respiratory exchange ratio, substrate oxidation, oxygen consumption ( ), overall session O 2 , and postexercise metabolism were compared using a series of linear mixed models (timepoint × phase).
RESULTS: There were no between-phase differences in , overall session O 2 , postexercise metabolism, or respiratory exchange ratio ( P > 0.119, R 2 < 0.993). There were also no between-phase differences in fat ( P = 0.417, R 2 = 0.920) or carbohydrate oxidation ( P = 0.235, R 2 = 0.845) during or postexercise.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate no differences across menstrual phase in during and postexercise metabolism following an acute bout of submaximal exercise.
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of three hormonally distinct phases of the menstrual cycle (FP, OP, and LP) on during and postexercise substrate oxidation following an acute bout of submaximal aerobic exercise in the fed state while utilizing best practices to determine menstrual phase.
METHODS: Thirteen females (age: 24 ± 4 yr, body mass index: 24.8 ± 5.4 kg·m -2 , max : 41.02 ± 5.30 mL·kg·min -1 ) completed 30 min of submaximal aerobic exercise in the FP, OP, and LP, where menstrual phase was tracked using cycle counting, oral body temperature, ovulation strips, and blood sampling. Between-phase differences in respiratory exchange ratio, substrate oxidation, oxygen consumption ( ), overall session O 2 , and postexercise metabolism were compared using a series of linear mixed models (timepoint × phase).
RESULTS: There were no between-phase differences in , overall session O 2 , postexercise metabolism, or respiratory exchange ratio ( P > 0.119, R 2 < 0.993). There were also no between-phase differences in fat ( P = 0.417, R 2 = 0.920) or carbohydrate oxidation ( P = 0.235, R 2 = 0.845) during or postexercise.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate no differences across menstrual phase in during and postexercise metabolism following an acute bout of submaximal exercise.