The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2026
Does Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Preserve Nasal Airway Function? A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McInerney Niall James, Eustace Jack, Amin Mohamed
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on functional outcomes following dorsal preservation rhinoplasty, with a focus on nasal obstruction.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2025. Studies reporting nasal airway outcomes following dorsal preservation rhinoplasty using subjective or objective measures were included.
RESULTS: Six studies comprising 662 patients were included. Patient-reported outcomes (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey and Visual Analogue Scale) consistently demonstrated significant post-operative improvement. Objective measures (acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and cone-beam computed tomography) showed maintained or improved airway dimensions. dorsal preservation rhinoplasty was functionally equivalent to traditional structural techniques, with low complication (<5 per cent) and revision rates (<2 per cent).
CONCLUSION: Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty maintains or improves nasal airway function while preserving structural integrity and reducing the need for grafting. It is a safe and effective alternative to traditional dorsal reduction techniques.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2025. Studies reporting nasal airway outcomes following dorsal preservation rhinoplasty using subjective or objective measures were included.
RESULTS: Six studies comprising 662 patients were included. Patient-reported outcomes (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey and Visual Analogue Scale) consistently demonstrated significant post-operative improvement. Objective measures (acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and cone-beam computed tomography) showed maintained or improved airway dimensions. dorsal preservation rhinoplasty was functionally equivalent to traditional structural techniques, with low complication (<5 per cent) and revision rates (<2 per cent).
CONCLUSION: Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty maintains or improves nasal airway function while preserving structural integrity and reducing the need for grafting. It is a safe and effective alternative to traditional dorsal reduction techniques.