MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00405-004-0870-5

Медицинская библиотека · European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2005

Bilateral peritonsillar abscesses.

Lehnerdt G, Senska K, Fischer M, Jahnke K

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In the discussion about the management of the peritonsillar abscess (PTA) in regard to the pros and cons of tonsillectomy à chaud versus à froid, the risk of obscure contralateral abscesses is often neglected. To the authors' knowledge, there are only a few series of PTA being analyzed for the abscess rate of bilateral PTA. A group of 541 abscess tonsillectomies was retrospectively analyzed for the presence of a bilateral manifestation of peritonsillar abscess. Twenty-one patients (3.88%) had bilateral abscesses. None of these had been detected prior to the operation. Of the 541 patients, 2.22% had postoperative hemorrhages that had to be arrested under general anesthesia. Within the discussion about abscess tonsillectomy versus stab incision followed by interval tonsillectomy (à froid), the rate of almost 4% bilateral abscesses should be taken into consideration as dangerous complications such as mediastinitis could develop from the remaining abscess formation of the contralateral side.

Для цитирования: Lehnerdt G, Senska K, Fischer M, Jahnke K. Bilateral peritonsillar abscesses.. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-004-0870-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.