Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2023
Evaluation of Depression and Anxiety in a Diverse Population With Thyroid Eye Disease Using the Nationwide NIH All of Us Database.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Tonya C, Radha-Saseendrakumar Bharanidharan, Delavar Arash, Ye Gordon Y, Ting Michelle A, Topilow Nicole J, Bass Jeremy, Korn Bobby S, Kikkawa Don O, Baxter Sally L, Liu Catherine Y
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety among individuals with thyroid eye disease (TED) and identify sociodemographic risk factors using the NIH All of Us database.
METHODS: Three hundred ninety eight cases with TED were compared with 1,592 controls with demographics matching the 2020 US Census. Primary outcomes were diagnosed depression or anxiety; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores were included as secondary outcomes. We performed multivariable logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between TED and depression and anxiety.
RESULTS: Patients with TED were more likely to have depression (OR 2.72, 95% CI 2.08-3.56, p < 0.001) and anxiety (OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.16-3.70, p < 0.001) than controls. In patients with TED, female gender was an independent risk factor for both depression (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.00-5.07, p = 0.05) and anxiety (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.25-3.85, p = 0.006). Unemployment (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03-2.94, p = 0.04) and lower income (OR 0.88 for income as a continuous variable, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p = 0.03) were risk factors for anxiety. Risk factors for more severe depression as assessed by PHQ-9 included lower income (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, p < 0.001), and protective factors included Black race (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.45, p = 0.002). Lower income was associated with more severe anxiety as assessed by GAD-7 (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TED were more likely to develop depression and anxiety compared with controls. This study highlights the psychosocial impact of TED and associated socioeconomic risk factors.
METHODS: Three hundred ninety eight cases with TED were compared with 1,592 controls with demographics matching the 2020 US Census. Primary outcomes were diagnosed depression or anxiety; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores were included as secondary outcomes. We performed multivariable logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between TED and depression and anxiety.
RESULTS: Patients with TED were more likely to have depression (OR 2.72, 95% CI 2.08-3.56, p < 0.001) and anxiety (OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.16-3.70, p < 0.001) than controls. In patients with TED, female gender was an independent risk factor for both depression (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.00-5.07, p = 0.05) and anxiety (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.25-3.85, p = 0.006). Unemployment (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03-2.94, p = 0.04) and lower income (OR 0.88 for income as a continuous variable, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p = 0.03) were risk factors for anxiety. Risk factors for more severe depression as assessed by PHQ-9 included lower income (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, p < 0.001), and protective factors included Black race (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.45, p = 0.002). Lower income was associated with more severe anxiety as assessed by GAD-7 (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TED were more likely to develop depression and anxiety compared with controls. This study highlights the psychosocial impact of TED and associated socioeconomic risk factors.