Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pachos Nikolaos, Cerfolio Robert J, Bizekis Costas, Chang Stephanie H, Kent Amie J, Liao Ming, Zervos Michael
Аннотация
We compare patients’ postoperative pain on the day of surgery and their analgesic use at their 2-week follow-up visit who underwent SP subcostal versus MP intercostal robotic pulmonary resection. A total of 2,613 robotic thoracic lung resections performed between July 2016 and October 2025 were screened. A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort of 164 patients (41 SP, 123 MP) was analyzed and matched 1:3 by age, gender, ASA class, BMI, and ethnicity. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (0–10) during the first 18 h. Analgesic consumption was assessed at the 2-week follow-up visit. From December 2022 to October 2025, 41 patients underwent SP robotic pulmonary resection and were propensity-matched to 123 MP patients. Lymph node yield was comparable for lobectomy (SP 29 ± 10 vs. MP 32 ± 11; p = .24) and sublobar resection (SP 24 ± 13 vs. MP 25 ± 10; p = .71). Operative time was longer in SP lobectomy (152.6 ± 34.4 vs. 128.7 ± 45.0 min; p = .01). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the SP group at all assessed intervals: 1–3, 3–10, and 10–18 h (p < .05). At the 2-week follow-up visit, patients in the SP group had lower analgesic use (p≤ .042). Single-port robotic pulmonary resection may be associated with lower early postoperative pain and reduced analgesic consumption at 2 weeks compared with multiport robotic resection. Prospective, multi-institutional studies are required to evaluate these findings.