Journal of medical genetics · 2025
Incidence of positive genetic testing among patients referred for cardiac positron emission tomography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Trinh Kathleen, Dries Annika, Boulier Kristin, Wang Jessica
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) is widely used to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Emerging evidence suggests genetic arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies (ACMs) may similarly present with episodes of myocardial inflammation resembling CS. We hypothesise a high rate of ACM diagnosis and associated pathogenic variants in patients with positive cardiac PET-CT scans referred for genetic testing. This study also seeks to delineate the role of PET-CT and anti-inflammatory therapy in ACM.
METHODS: Patients at the UCLA Cardiovascular Genetics Clinic who underwent a cardiomyopathy gene panel were included. Genotypes were classified as genotype-positive (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants), uncertain (variant of uncertain significance) or negative. Genes were grouped into ACM or non-ACM. PET-CT positivity was defined by cardiac fludeoxyglucose uptake without extracardiac involvement.
RESULTS: Among 48 patients receiving PET-CT scans, 48% (23/48) were genotype-positive. Of 268 patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, 23 (8.6%) underwent PET-CT (11 ACM, 12 non-ACM). PET-CT positivity was observed in 27% (3/11) of ACM and 8% (1/12) of non-ACM cases. Two PET-CT-positive patients (FLNC, MYH7) received steroids with variable outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Receiving a PET-CT scan yielded a high genetic diagnostic yield (48%) in our clinic. Randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive responsiveness and novel therapeutics are needed to address treatment gaps for ACM.
METHODS: Patients at the UCLA Cardiovascular Genetics Clinic who underwent a cardiomyopathy gene panel were included. Genotypes were classified as genotype-positive (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants), uncertain (variant of uncertain significance) or negative. Genes were grouped into ACM or non-ACM. PET-CT positivity was defined by cardiac fludeoxyglucose uptake without extracardiac involvement.
RESULTS: Among 48 patients receiving PET-CT scans, 48% (23/48) were genotype-positive. Of 268 patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, 23 (8.6%) underwent PET-CT (11 ACM, 12 non-ACM). PET-CT positivity was observed in 27% (3/11) of ACM and 8% (1/12) of non-ACM cases. Two PET-CT-positive patients (FLNC, MYH7) received steroids with variable outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Receiving a PET-CT scan yielded a high genetic diagnostic yield (48%) in our clinic. Randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive responsiveness and novel therapeutics are needed to address treatment gaps for ACM.