BMC endocrine disorders · 2020
New parathyroid function index for the differentiation of primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism: a case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Yanhong, Wang Qin, Lu Chunyan, Fan Pianpian, Li Jing, Luo Ximing, Chen Decai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) may be asymptomatic, and some may present with normocalcemic PHPT (NPHPT). Patients with vitamin D deficiency may also be asymptomatic, with normal calcium and elevated PTH concentrations. These latter patients are usually diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency-induced secondary hyperparathyroidism (VD-SHPT). Therefore, it is very difficult to distinguish PHPT and NPHPT from VD-SHPT based on calcium or PTH concentrations in clinical settings. In this case-control study, we aimed to verify the diagnostic power of a new parathyroid function index (PFindex = Ca*PTH/P).
METHODS: This study enrolled 128 patients with surgically and pathologically confirmed PHPT, including 36 with NPHPT, at a hospital in West China between January 2009 and September 2017. Thirty-seven patients with VD-SHPT and 45 healthy controls were selected from the population of a cross-sectional epidemiological study as the SHPT and healthy groups, respectively. We used the PFindex to describe the characteristics of PHPT, NPHPT, and VD-SHPT.. Differences between the four groups were compared, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of PFindex.
RESULTS: The PHPT group had the highest PFindex (454 ± 430), compared to the other three groups (NPHPT: 101 ± 111; SHPT: 21.7 ± 6.38; healthy: 12.2 ± 2.98, all p < 0.001). A PFindex cut-off value of 34 yielded sensitivity and specificity rates of 96.9 and 97.6% and of 94.4 and 94.6% for the diagnoses of PHPT and NPHPT, respectively. The use of a PFindex > 34 to differentiate NPHPT from VD-SHPT yielded the highest positive likelihood ratio and lowest negative likelihood ratio.
CONCLUSION: The PFindex provided excellent diagnostic power for the differentiation of NPHPT from VD-SHPT. This simple tool may be useful for guiding timely decision-making processes regarding the initiation of vitamin D treatment or surgery for PHPT.
METHODS: This study enrolled 128 patients with surgically and pathologically confirmed PHPT, including 36 with NPHPT, at a hospital in West China between January 2009 and September 2017. Thirty-seven patients with VD-SHPT and 45 healthy controls were selected from the population of a cross-sectional epidemiological study as the SHPT and healthy groups, respectively. We used the PFindex to describe the characteristics of PHPT, NPHPT, and VD-SHPT.. Differences between the four groups were compared, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of PFindex.
RESULTS: The PHPT group had the highest PFindex (454 ± 430), compared to the other three groups (NPHPT: 101 ± 111; SHPT: 21.7 ± 6.38; healthy: 12.2 ± 2.98, all p < 0.001). A PFindex cut-off value of 34 yielded sensitivity and specificity rates of 96.9 and 97.6% and of 94.4 and 94.6% for the diagnoses of PHPT and NPHPT, respectively. The use of a PFindex > 34 to differentiate NPHPT from VD-SHPT yielded the highest positive likelihood ratio and lowest negative likelihood ratio.
CONCLUSION: The PFindex provided excellent diagnostic power for the differentiation of NPHPT from VD-SHPT. This simple tool may be useful for guiding timely decision-making processes regarding the initiation of vitamin D treatment or surgery for PHPT.