European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
The role of the window-damping test in preoperative decision-making for semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zou Jing, Li Hongbin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of a novel window-damping test (WDT), which involves a simple intratympanic injection of fibrin to dampen the movement of the round window membrane and stapedial footplate, in predicting surgical outcomes for round window reinforcement (RWR) in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SSCDS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 8 patients with clinically suspected SSCDS. Patients underwent pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing, and high-resolution CT scans with multiplanar reconstruction. The WDT involved sequential intratympanic injection of fibrin sealant components into the posterior middle ear cavity to simulate RWR, which was achieved by damping the movement of the round window membrane and stapedial footplate. RWR surgery was performed to alleviate symptoms, and symptom changes were compared between WDT and RWR.
RESULTS: Although signs of a 'third mobile window' were not universally observed in diagnostic tests, WDT yielded positive results in all patients. The test effectively simulated the biomechanical effects of RWR, demonstrating even greater efficacy than surgery in most cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel WDT is a safe, cost-effective, and valuable preoperative tool for predicting surgical outcomes of RWR in SSCDS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 8 patients with clinically suspected SSCDS. Patients underwent pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing, and high-resolution CT scans with multiplanar reconstruction. The WDT involved sequential intratympanic injection of fibrin sealant components into the posterior middle ear cavity to simulate RWR, which was achieved by damping the movement of the round window membrane and stapedial footplate. RWR surgery was performed to alleviate symptoms, and symptom changes were compared between WDT and RWR.
RESULTS: Although signs of a 'third mobile window' were not universally observed in diagnostic tests, WDT yielded positive results in all patients. The test effectively simulated the biomechanical effects of RWR, demonstrating even greater efficacy than surgery in most cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel WDT is a safe, cost-effective, and valuable preoperative tool for predicting surgical outcomes of RWR in SSCDS.