The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025
Have we made any undergraduate medical education improvements since coronavirus disease 2019? A systematic review of ENT teaching.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davies Timothy, Hampton Thomas
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Otolaryngology/ear, nose and throat conditions are common in clinical practice, yet undergraduate exposure in UK medical schools remains limited. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic created opportunities to innovate medical education. This review explores the scope of advance in otolaryngology undergraduate education following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Education Resources Information Center databases was conducted. Studies that met inclusion criteria were subject to risk-of-bias assessment and narrative analysis.
RESULTS: Interventions such as mixed reality, cadaveric teaching, and anatomical models improved short-term performance and student satisfaction. Surveys limited advancement in clinical exposure to otolaryngology/ear, nose and throat, when compared to pre-coronavirus-disease literature.
CONCLUSION: Despite the potential for reform following the pandemic, there has been no significant advancement in the provision of undergraduate medical education in the post-coronavirus-disease era. Standardisation of undergraduate education is needed to mirror recent changes to assessment in undergraduate education in the UK.
METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Education Resources Information Center databases was conducted. Studies that met inclusion criteria were subject to risk-of-bias assessment and narrative analysis.
RESULTS: Interventions such as mixed reality, cadaveric teaching, and anatomical models improved short-term performance and student satisfaction. Surveys limited advancement in clinical exposure to otolaryngology/ear, nose and throat, when compared to pre-coronavirus-disease literature.
CONCLUSION: Despite the potential for reform following the pandemic, there has been no significant advancement in the provision of undergraduate medical education in the post-coronavirus-disease era. Standardisation of undergraduate education is needed to mirror recent changes to assessment in undergraduate education in the UK.