MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/vetsci13050481

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary sciences · 2026

Breed-Specific Dental Variations in Dogs Assessing Malocclusions Using Computed Tomography (CT).

Habib Hamza, Soothar Mumta, Pan Xiaoxuan, Ding Mingfei, Zheng Chengli, Zhang Ming, Zhou Ziyao

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Dental malocclusions are common and often underdiagnosed situations in dogs, which might result in oral trauma, impaired mastication, and periodontal disease. Nevertheless, scientific investigations into breed-specific variations in dentition remain scarce. To evaluate breed-specific dental variations in dogs, a retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 92 clinical canine head computed tomography (CT) scans obtained in Chengdu, China, representing a range of breeds and skull morphologies. Dental alignment and occlusal relationships were calculated using standardized malocclusion classification criteria. As a result, malocclusions were found and identified in 46.7% of dogs. Among them, brachycephalic breeds indicated a high prevalence of malocclusion, with Shiba Inu dogs demonstrating the highest malocclusion rate (66.7%), whereas Golden Retrievers and Akitas showed the lowest prevalence (16.7%). Class I malocclusions characterized by dental crowding were most common (44.19%), followed by Class II malocclusions (overbite) (30.23%), and Class III malocclusions (underbite) (20.93%). Our findings demonstrated a strong association between skull morphology and dental alignment abnormalities.

Для цитирования: Habib Hamza, Soothar Mumta, Pan Xiaoxuan, Ding Mingfei, Zheng Chengli, Zhang Ming, Zhou Ziyao. Breed-Specific Dental Variations in Dogs Assessing Malocclusions Using Computed Tomography (CT).. Veterinary sciences. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci13050481.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.