Transplantation · 1997
Persistent hypersplenism early after liver transplant: the role of splenectomy.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Altaca G, Scigliano E, Guy S R, Sheiner P A, Reich D J, Schwartz M E, Miller C M, Emre S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transient thrombocytopenia is common after liver transplantation, but persisting thrombocytopenia worsens the prognosis after transplant.
METHODS: Two patients underwent splenectomy for persistent thrombocytopenia early after liver transplantation. The first patient had a platelet count of 17,000/mm3 on postoperative day (POD) 6; her hemoglobin and white blood cell counts were normal. Work-ups including bone marrow aspiration, Coombs test, and antiplatelet antibody test were negative. On POD 9, she had abdominal bleeding with a platelet count of 17,000/mm3 despite repeated platelet transfusions, and splenectomy was done. The second patient had a platelet count of 3000/mm3 on POD 14, white blood cell was 1600/mm3, and hemoglobin was 7.7 g/dl. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hypercellular marrow. Because his platelet count remained at 2000/mm3 despite empiric treatment with intravenous immune globulin and methylprednisolone, splenectomy was performed.
RESULTS: The first patient's platelet count rose to 155,000/mm3 by POD 8. The second patient's platelet count reached 210,000/mm3 on POD 5. Neither patient has had an episode of thrombocytopenia at 36 and 32 months after splenectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy can be used after liver transplantation for severe, persistent thrombocytopenic states that cannot be attributed to sepsis, intravascular coagulation, immunological causes, or drug effects.
METHODS: Two patients underwent splenectomy for persistent thrombocytopenia early after liver transplantation. The first patient had a platelet count of 17,000/mm3 on postoperative day (POD) 6; her hemoglobin and white blood cell counts were normal. Work-ups including bone marrow aspiration, Coombs test, and antiplatelet antibody test were negative. On POD 9, she had abdominal bleeding with a platelet count of 17,000/mm3 despite repeated platelet transfusions, and splenectomy was done. The second patient had a platelet count of 3000/mm3 on POD 14, white blood cell was 1600/mm3, and hemoglobin was 7.7 g/dl. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hypercellular marrow. Because his platelet count remained at 2000/mm3 despite empiric treatment with intravenous immune globulin and methylprednisolone, splenectomy was performed.
RESULTS: The first patient's platelet count rose to 155,000/mm3 by POD 8. The second patient's platelet count reached 210,000/mm3 on POD 5. Neither patient has had an episode of thrombocytopenia at 36 and 32 months after splenectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy can be used after liver transplantation for severe, persistent thrombocytopenic states that cannot be attributed to sepsis, intravascular coagulation, immunological causes, or drug effects.