MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-4-151

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2010

Therapeutic approach to Gradenigo's syndrome: a case report.

Kantas Ilias, Papadopoulou Anna, Balatsouras Dimitrios G, Aspris Andreas, Marangos Nikolaos

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Traditional management of Gradenigo's syndrome requires aggressive and radical surgery without any attempt to preserve hearing. Recent reports, however, describe a successful outcome after conservative surgical intervention without labyrinthectomy. A similar outcome has also been reported in patients who were only prescribed with antibiotics and did not undergo myringotomy.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 24-year-old Caucasian Greek woman with Gradenigo's syndrome who was treated by draining her petrous apex via an infralabyrithine approach between her posterior semicircular canal and the jugular bulb. Her inner ear was not sacrificed during the procedure. She presented pre-operatively with ipsilateral conductive hearing loss, which recovered completely four weeks after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Gradenigo's syndrome may be successfully treated with a combination of long-term permanent drainage and ventilation of the apical cells with corresponding hearing preservation. This can be achieved via a combination of transmastoid, infralabyrinthine and suprajugular approaches, if such would be allowed by the anatomy of the region or if there is enough space between the posterior semicircular canal and the jugular bulb.

Для цитирования: Kantas Ilias, Papadopoulou Anna, Balatsouras Dimitrios G, Aspris Andreas, Marangos Nikolaos. Therapeutic approach to Gradenigo's syndrome: a case report.. Journal of medical case reports. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-4-151.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.