Utility of a Model to Predict Endothelial Cell Density of Donor Corneas to Determine Suitability for Transplantation.

IMPORTANCE

The geographic distribution of pediatric ophthalmological care has not been reported on since 2007; understanding this distribution could shed light on potential avenues to increase access, which is a necessary first step in addressing the pediatric ophthalmological needs of underserved areas.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the number and location (ie, geographic distribution) of pediatric ophthalmologists in relation to US population demographic characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

In this cross-sectional study, public databases from the American Academy of Ophthalmology and American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus were used to identify pediatric ophthalmologists in the US as of March 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Geographic distribution of pediatric ophthalmologists listed in public databases and any association between pediatric ophthalmologist distribution and US population demographic characteristics. Addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS Pro (Esri).

RESULTS

A total of 1056 pediatric ophthalmologists (611 men [57.9%]) were identified. States with the most pediatric ophthalmologists were California (n = 116 [11.0%]), New York (n = 97 [9.2%]), Florida (n = 69 [6.5%]), and Texas (n = 62 [5.9%]), the 4 most populous states. A total of 2828 of 3142 counties (90.0%) and 4 of 50 states (8.0%) had 0 pediatric ophthalmologists. In 314 counties (10.0%) with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists, the mean (range) pediatric ophthalmologists per million persons was 7.7 (0.4-185.5). The range of practitioner to million persons has increased since 2007. Counties with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists had a higher median (SD) household income compared with counties with 0 pediatric ophthalmologists ($70 230.59 [$18 945.05] vs $53 263.62 [$12 786.07]; difference, -$16 966.97; 95% CI, -$18 544.57 to -$14 389.37; P < .001). Additionally, the proportion of families in each county without internet service (8.0% vs 4.7%; difference, 3.4%; 95% CI, 3.0%-3.7%; P < .001), the proportion of persons younger than 19 years without health insurance (5.7% vs 4.1%; difference, 1.6%; 95% CI, 1.1%-2.2%; P < .001), and the proportion of households without vehicle access (2.1% vs 1.8%; difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, 0.6%-5.2%; P = .001) were greater in counties with 0 compared with counties with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This cross-sectional study found that disparities in access to pediatric ophthalmological care have increased over the past 15 years and are associated with lower socioeconomic status. As patients may rely on online sources to identify the nearest pediatric ophthalmologist, accurate publicly available databases are important.