Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
Assessing the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Study With Unannounced Standardized Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khan Mahima, Yu Shelley, Henderson Abigail, Garcia David, Kijowski Matthew, Hanley Kathleen, Altshuler Lisa
Аннотация
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Shared decision making (SDM) is widely endorsed in clinical guidelines, yet clinicians may not use it consistently across different clinical problems. This study explores how SDM is influenced by the clinical topic under discussion.
METHODS: Using unannounced standardized patients (USPs), we observed how resident physicians engaged in SDM during new patient visits involving both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and smoking cessation. Audio recordings were evaluated using the validated Observer OPTION-5 tool.
RESULTS: SDM scores were significantly higher in smoking cessation discussions than in GERD management. Residents more frequently integrated patient preferences when discussing smoking but gave more information when managing GERD.
CONCLUSIONS: Residents appeared to adjust their SDM behaviors based on topic, suggesting context-dependent application. Educational interventions should address this variability and promote balanced use of SDM across routine and behaviorally complex decisions.
METHODS: Using unannounced standardized patients (USPs), we observed how resident physicians engaged in SDM during new patient visits involving both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and smoking cessation. Audio recordings were evaluated using the validated Observer OPTION-5 tool.
RESULTS: SDM scores were significantly higher in smoking cessation discussions than in GERD management. Residents more frequently integrated patient preferences when discussing smoking but gave more information when managing GERD.
CONCLUSIONS: Residents appeared to adjust their SDM behaviors based on topic, suggesting context-dependent application. Educational interventions should address this variability and promote balanced use of SDM across routine and behaviorally complex decisions.