International ophthalmology · 2020
Ophthalmic artery resistance index after peribulbar block in the presence of epinephrine.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Machado Ilma Patrícia, Vasconcelos Galton Carvalho, Lopes Rodrigo Souza, Gomez Renato Santiago
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There are controversies regarding ophthalmic artery (OA) flow after peribulbar block in the presence of epinephrine. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate OA flow via echo-Doppler before and after peribulbar block with lidocaine in the presence or absence of epinephrine.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of I, II or III and were eligible for cataract phacoemulsification surgery were selected. Patients with other eye diseases were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1-peribulbar block with lidocaine and 1/200,000 epinephrine; group 2-peribulbar block with lidocaine in the absence of epinephrine. The resistance index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) of the OA were evaluated using echo-Doppler before and 10 min after the peribulbar block.
RESULTS: No differences between groups were observed in the RI before the peribulbar block as well regarding the presence of hypertension and the age or gender of the patient. After the peribulbar block, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.038, Cohen's d = 0.336) and no difference in the RI in group 2 (p = 0.109, Cohen's d = 0.172). When comparing group 1 and group 2, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.028, Cohen's d = 0,583). There was no difference between groups regarding the PSV and EDV after the peribulbar block.
CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in RI was observed in the OA after peribulbar block with a vasoconstrictor, an effect that could be a benefit in some ocular surgeries.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of I, II or III and were eligible for cataract phacoemulsification surgery were selected. Patients with other eye diseases were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1-peribulbar block with lidocaine and 1/200,000 epinephrine; group 2-peribulbar block with lidocaine in the absence of epinephrine. The resistance index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) of the OA were evaluated using echo-Doppler before and 10 min after the peribulbar block.
RESULTS: No differences between groups were observed in the RI before the peribulbar block as well regarding the presence of hypertension and the age or gender of the patient. After the peribulbar block, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.038, Cohen's d = 0.336) and no difference in the RI in group 2 (p = 0.109, Cohen's d = 0.172). When comparing group 1 and group 2, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.028, Cohen's d = 0,583). There was no difference between groups regarding the PSV and EDV after the peribulbar block.
CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in RI was observed in the OA after peribulbar block with a vasoconstrictor, an effect that could be a benefit in some ocular surgeries.