MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215123000622

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2023

Frontal sinus stenting in endoscopic sinus surgery: the 10-year Oxford experience.

Bandino F, Pendolino A, Bates J, Qureishi A, Martinez-Devesa P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus stents have been introduced to reduce frontal sinus re-stenosis after surgery and to improve outcomes.

METHOD: This study was a retrospective analysis of 19 patients who had endoscopic sinus surgery with approach to the frontal sinus and insertion of a soft sinus stent.

RESULTS

The frontal recess was patent in 78.9 per cent and stenosed in 21.1 per cent of patients; no completely closed recesses were observed. Mean follow up was 20.7 months, and time period of stenting was 9.8 months on average; complications were observed in 47.4 per cent of the patients, with post-operative sinonasal infection being the most common.

CONCLUSION

In the authors' experience, indications for frontal sinus stenting include recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis after multiple functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (especially in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps), patients with history of important craniofacial surgery or trauma, and recurrent mucoceles. The stent was overall well tolerated as only minor complications were observed. Close clinical follow up is mandatory.

Для цитирования: Bandino F, Pendolino A, Bates J, Qureishi A, Martinez-Devesa P. Frontal sinus stenting in endoscopic sinus surgery: the 10-year Oxford experience.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2023. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215123000622.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.