Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 1988
Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pickwell L D, Gilchrist J M, Hesler J
Аннотация
The Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer are compared in terms of their ability to measure associated heterophoria. Twenty-two asymptomatic subjects were used. With the Disparometer, ten of these subjects, familiar with making prism vergence measurements, exhibited stable forced vergence fixation disparity curves, and the associated heterophoria values using both instruments were not significantly different. However, the twelve subjects not familiar with making such measurements generated fluctuating, unstable fixation disparity curves, and the associated heterophoria values were significantly different. Repeated trials with the randomly selected naïve subjects led to flatter, more stable fixation disparity curves and lower values for the x- and y-intercepts when using the Disparometer. The Mallett test, however, produced identical values for associated heterophoria in each successive trial. Therefore, the validity of measurements using the Disparometer in a clinical setting is questioned.