European journal of haematology · 2023
Prognostic value of the mutation types and dynamics of FLT3-ITD in acute myeloid leukemia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koo Mosae, Song Ik-Chan, Kim Jimyung, Kwon Gye Cheol, Kim Seon Young
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The prognostic value of the mutation types and dynamics of FLT3-ITD in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other known factors were studied.
METHODS: Initial and follow-up samples from 45 AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations were analyzed by fragment length analysis, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: Some patients (13%) had multiple FLT3-ITD mutations, and many of them had acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). FLT3-ITD mutations were classified according to mutation types, including duplication-only FLT3-ITD (52%) and FLT3-ITD with duplications and insertions (dup + ins) (48%). The dup + ins FLT3-ITD variant was independently associated with poor prognosis among non-APL patients (odds ratio, 2.92) in addition to FLT3-ITD with ≥50% variant allele frequency (VAF). The VAFs of FLT3-ITD were low (median 2.2%) when detected during morphologic complete remission (CR) after conventional chemotherapy; however, in two patients treated with gilteritinib after relapse, the VAFs of FLT3-ITD were much higher (>95% and 8.1%) in the morphologic CR state.
CONCLUSIONS: The type of FLT3-ITD mutation is important in prognosis, and the dup + ins type of FLT3-ITD can be an indicator of poor prognosis. In addition, the FLT3-ITD mutation status may unexpectedly not match the morphologic examination results after gilteritinib treatment.
METHODS: Initial and follow-up samples from 45 AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations were analyzed by fragment length analysis, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: Some patients (13%) had multiple FLT3-ITD mutations, and many of them had acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). FLT3-ITD mutations were classified according to mutation types, including duplication-only FLT3-ITD (52%) and FLT3-ITD with duplications and insertions (dup + ins) (48%). The dup + ins FLT3-ITD variant was independently associated with poor prognosis among non-APL patients (odds ratio, 2.92) in addition to FLT3-ITD with ≥50% variant allele frequency (VAF). The VAFs of FLT3-ITD were low (median 2.2%) when detected during morphologic complete remission (CR) after conventional chemotherapy; however, in two patients treated with gilteritinib after relapse, the VAFs of FLT3-ITD were much higher (>95% and 8.1%) in the morphologic CR state.
CONCLUSIONS: The type of FLT3-ITD mutation is important in prognosis, and the dup + ins type of FLT3-ITD can be an indicator of poor prognosis. In addition, the FLT3-ITD mutation status may unexpectedly not match the morphologic examination results after gilteritinib treatment.