International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2024
Cochlear implantation in pediatrics: Impact of newborn hearing screening on intervention time.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alothman Noura, Abdelsamad Yassin, Almuhawas Fida, Allami Hussain, Hagr Abdulrahman
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The newborn hearing screening (NHS) program was globally established for early hearing loss (HL) identification and intervention. Early intervention is essential to minimize or prevent the negative consequences of HL. In Saudi Arabia, the NHS was officially implemented in 2016. Currently, its impact on the timing of cochlear implantations (CIs) in Saudi Arabia remains unclear, and information on potential hospital-related delays affecting early implantation is lacking. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing the NHS on age at CI in children with prelingual deafness in a CI center in Saudi Arabia, and to evaluate the hospital timing in the CI process.
METHODS: All pediatric CI users who presented for the first time to the CI committee (CIC) at a tertiary center and received their implants between 2015 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. Date of birth (DOB), date of presentation to the CI committee (DOCIC), and date of CI surgery (DOCIS) were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: In total, 304 CI children were included in the analysis. Approximately 55 % of the children (n = 167) were screened for HL through the NHS, whereas 45 % of the children (n = 137) were born before the launch of the NHS. Both age at the presentation to the CIC (i.e. difference between DOCIC and DOB) and age at implantation (i.e. difference between DOCIS and DOB) were significantly earlier in children who were screened for HL through the NHS than those who were not screened (P < 0.0001). The time difference between the DOCIC and DOCIS was not significantly different between the screened and unscreened children (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The implementation of the NHS in the tertiary center has a significant positive effect on age at presentation to the CIC and age at implantation, but not on the actual CI surgery. Further research is needed to reduce the hospital delays before the actual surgery in order to increase the likelihood of children receiving implantation early in their life.
METHODS: All pediatric CI users who presented for the first time to the CI committee (CIC) at a tertiary center and received their implants between 2015 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. Date of birth (DOB), date of presentation to the CI committee (DOCIC), and date of CI surgery (DOCIS) were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: In total, 304 CI children were included in the analysis. Approximately 55 % of the children (n = 167) were screened for HL through the NHS, whereas 45 % of the children (n = 137) were born before the launch of the NHS. Both age at the presentation to the CIC (i.e. difference between DOCIC and DOB) and age at implantation (i.e. difference between DOCIS and DOB) were significantly earlier in children who were screened for HL through the NHS than those who were not screened (P < 0.0001). The time difference between the DOCIC and DOCIS was not significantly different between the screened and unscreened children (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The implementation of the NHS in the tertiary center has a significant positive effect on age at presentation to the CIC and age at implantation, but not on the actual CI surgery. Further research is needed to reduce the hospital delays before the actual surgery in order to increase the likelihood of children receiving implantation early in their life.