MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0028-3886.27154

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology India · 2006

Cranial nerve involvement in patients with leprous neuropathy.

Kumar Sudhir, Alexander Mathew, Gnanamuthu Chandran

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Leprosy is one of the most common causes of peripheral neuropathy, perhaps closely matched by diabetic neuropathy. Patterns of peripheral neuropathy in leprosy can be varied, which may include mononeuropathy, mononeuritis multiplex and symmetric polyneuropathy. Cranial nerves, especially facial and trigeminal nerves, are also commonly involved in leprosy.

AIMS: To find out the pattern and spectrum of cranial nerve involvement in a consecutive series of patients with leprous neuropathy.

SETTINGS AND

DESIGN

A retrospective review of patients admitted with leprosy to the Neurology Department of a tertiary care center.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

All consecutive patients admitted during an 8-year period (1995-2003) and diagnosed to have leprosy were included. They were clinically evaluated to determine the frequency and pattern of cranial nerve involvement.

RESULTS

About 18% (9/51) of the leprosy patients seen during that period had clinical evidence of cranial nerve involvement. Facial and trigeminal nerves were the most commonly affected (five and four patients respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial nerve involvement is common in leprosy, which emphasizes the need to carefully examine them. Also, one should exclude leprosy in patients presenting with isolated cranial neuropathies.

Для цитирования: Kumar Sudhir, Alexander Mathew, Gnanamuthu Chandran. Cranial nerve involvement in patients with leprous neuropathy.. Neurology India. 2006. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.27154.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.