Journal of clinical pathology · 2003
Audit of the clinical usefulness of a rapid qualitative ELISA screen for antimyeloperoxidase and antiproteinase 3 antibodies in the assessment of patients with suspected vasculitis.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aslam A, Newman T L, Misbah S A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The need for urgent antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) results when assessing patients with acute renal failure, pulmonary renal syndrome, or mononeuritis multiplex has led to the development of a rapid qualitative ELISA screening assay for antibodies to myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3).
AIMS: To report the use of a rapid qualitative ELISA screen for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA in a regional immunology laboratory and its correlation with standard indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and quantitative ELISA for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA.
METHODS: Over 12 months, 103 samples requiring urgent ANCA testing were screened by a rapid qualitative ELISA and the results compared with IIF and quantitative ELISA assays for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA.
RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between the rapid qualitative ELISA and standard ANCA IIF and a routine ELISA for MPO/PR3-ANCA, with sensitivities ranging from 82% to 100%. There were two false negatives, which gave weak to moderately positive values as determined by routine ELISA. However, the clinical relevance of these two cases is doubtful.
CONCLUSIONS: The rapid ELISA for anti-MPO and anti-PR3 correlates well with quantitative ELISA and IIF ANCA, and urgent management decisions in patients with suspected small vessel vasculitis can be based with confidence on this test.
AIMS: To report the use of a rapid qualitative ELISA screen for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA in a regional immunology laboratory and its correlation with standard indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and quantitative ELISA for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA.
METHODS: Over 12 months, 103 samples requiring urgent ANCA testing were screened by a rapid qualitative ELISA and the results compared with IIF and quantitative ELISA assays for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA.
RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between the rapid qualitative ELISA and standard ANCA IIF and a routine ELISA for MPO/PR3-ANCA, with sensitivities ranging from 82% to 100%. There were two false negatives, which gave weak to moderately positive values as determined by routine ELISA. However, the clinical relevance of these two cases is doubtful.
CONCLUSIONS: The rapid ELISA for anti-MPO and anti-PR3 correlates well with quantitative ELISA and IIF ANCA, and urgent management decisions in patients with suspected small vessel vasculitis can be based with confidence on this test.