International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Lung Hyperinflation in Patients with Stable COPD: An Effective Diagnostic Tool.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Yongjian, Li Jingyun, Zhu Zhixing, Lyu Guorong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of lung hyperinflation (LH) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by lung ultrasound score (LUS) and assess its value.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a study of 149 patients with stable COPD and 100 healthy controls recruited by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The pleural sliding displacement (PSD) was measured, the sliding of the pleura in different areas was observed, and LUS was calculated from both of them. The diaphragm excursion (DE), residual capacity (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), inspiratory capacity (IC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) were measured. We described the correlation between ultrasound indicators and pulmonary function indicators reflecting LH. Multiple linear regression analysis was used. The ROC curves of LUS and DE were drawn to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy, and De Long method was used for comparison.
RESULTS: (1) The LUS of patients with stable COPD were positively correlated with RV, TLC, RV/TLC and FRC and negatively correlated with IC and IC/TLC (r1=0.72, r2=0.41, r3=0.72, r4=0.70, r5=-0.56, r6=-0.65, P < 0.001). The correlation was stronger than that between DE at maximal deep inspiration and the corresponding pulmonary function indices (r1=-0.41, r2=-0.26, r3=-0.40, r4=-0.43, r5=0.30, r6=0.37, P < 0.001). (2) Multiple linear regression analysis showed that LUS were significantly correlated with IC/TLC and RV/TLC. (3) With IC/TLC<25% and RV/TLC>60% as the diagnostic criterion of severe LH, the areas under the ROC curves of LUS and DE at maximal deep inspiration for diagnosing severe LH were 0.914 and 0.385, 0.845 and 0.543, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The lung ultrasound score is an important parameter for evaluating LH. LUS is better than DE at maximal deep inspiration for diagnosing severe LH and is expected to become an effective auxiliary tool for evaluating LH.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a study of 149 patients with stable COPD and 100 healthy controls recruited by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The pleural sliding displacement (PSD) was measured, the sliding of the pleura in different areas was observed, and LUS was calculated from both of them. The diaphragm excursion (DE), residual capacity (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), inspiratory capacity (IC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) were measured. We described the correlation between ultrasound indicators and pulmonary function indicators reflecting LH. Multiple linear regression analysis was used. The ROC curves of LUS and DE were drawn to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy, and De Long method was used for comparison.
RESULTS: (1) The LUS of patients with stable COPD were positively correlated with RV, TLC, RV/TLC and FRC and negatively correlated with IC and IC/TLC (r1=0.72, r2=0.41, r3=0.72, r4=0.70, r5=-0.56, r6=-0.65, P < 0.001). The correlation was stronger than that between DE at maximal deep inspiration and the corresponding pulmonary function indices (r1=-0.41, r2=-0.26, r3=-0.40, r4=-0.43, r5=0.30, r6=0.37, P < 0.001). (2) Multiple linear regression analysis showed that LUS were significantly correlated with IC/TLC and RV/TLC. (3) With IC/TLC<25% and RV/TLC>60% as the diagnostic criterion of severe LH, the areas under the ROC curves of LUS and DE at maximal deep inspiration for diagnosing severe LH were 0.914 and 0.385, 0.845 and 0.543, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The lung ultrasound score is an important parameter for evaluating LH. LUS is better than DE at maximal deep inspiration for diagnosing severe LH and is expected to become an effective auxiliary tool for evaluating LH.