Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2026
Development of a patient-reported experience measure for temporomandibular disorders: exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taimeh Dina, NiRiordain Richeal, Fedele Stefano, Leeson Rachel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of a newly developed patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for individuals with painful temporomandibular disorders. This PREM was developed to assess the experience of patients while receiving healthcare.
STUDY DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 139 patients completed the PREM following clinical visits, with 50 repeating it 2 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Cronbach α coefficient, and interclass correlation coefficient were utilized to assess the structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, respectively.
RESULTS: EFA identified a 5-factor structure with 21 items. These domains were "emotional support," "respect for patient centred values," "information, communication and education," "access to care," and "coordination of care." The Cronbach α was 0.7285, indicating good internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.732, reflecting good test-retest reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: The PREM is a brief tool, which shows potential in assessing patient experiences in facial pain services. It may also support audits and clinical research. Further psychometric validation is recommended.
STUDY DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 139 patients completed the PREM following clinical visits, with 50 repeating it 2 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Cronbach α coefficient, and interclass correlation coefficient were utilized to assess the structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, respectively.
RESULTS: EFA identified a 5-factor structure with 21 items. These domains were "emotional support," "respect for patient centred values," "information, communication and education," "access to care," and "coordination of care." The Cronbach α was 0.7285, indicating good internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.732, reflecting good test-retest reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: The PREM is a brief tool, which shows potential in assessing patient experiences in facial pain services. It may also support audits and clinical research. Further psychometric validation is recommended.