Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
A Chaotic Approach to Glottal Gap Voice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smereka Katerina A, Johnson Colbey, Guastello Alexa Q, Moreira Elise A, Madhushankar Ashvath, Jiang Jack J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Airway glottic insufficiency, or glottal gap, may lead to a breathy voice quality. It is hypothesized that a glottal gap may be a source of nonlinearity in speech production. This study aims to gain a chaotic and acoustic profile of glottal gap voice provided by phonation of excised larynges subjected to the insertion of a metal shim in the posterior glottis.
STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized quasi-experimental study.
METHODS: Posterior glottal gap varied from 0 to 3.5 mm in 0.5 mm intervals. Each treatment was investigated independently in a sample population of eight excised canine larynges. Phonation of the larynges for each treatment was recorded and analyzed for the cepstral peak prominence (CPP), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), and correlation dimension.
RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests yielded significant differences across shim groups for all parameters. Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc tests revealed that the control group differed significantly from the 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 mm groups for all metrics. Moreover, Kendall correlation tests indicated a moderately positive correlation between glottal gap size and correlation dimension, a moderately negative correlation between glottal gap size and CPP and between glottal gap size and the HNR.
CONCLUSIONS: Glottic insufficiency provides a source of nonlinearity in phonation. Nonlinear dynamic analysis provides quantitative insight into glottal gap voice. This study encourages future studies to further evaluate the relationship between glottal gap and correlation dimension.
STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized quasi-experimental study.
METHODS: Posterior glottal gap varied from 0 to 3.5 mm in 0.5 mm intervals. Each treatment was investigated independently in a sample population of eight excised canine larynges. Phonation of the larynges for each treatment was recorded and analyzed for the cepstral peak prominence (CPP), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), and correlation dimension.
RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests yielded significant differences across shim groups for all parameters. Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc tests revealed that the control group differed significantly from the 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 mm groups for all metrics. Moreover, Kendall correlation tests indicated a moderately positive correlation between glottal gap size and correlation dimension, a moderately negative correlation between glottal gap size and CPP and between glottal gap size and the HNR.
CONCLUSIONS: Glottic insufficiency provides a source of nonlinearity in phonation. Nonlinear dynamic analysis provides quantitative insight into glottal gap voice. This study encourages future studies to further evaluate the relationship between glottal gap and correlation dimension.