Acta oto-laryngologica · 2024
Minimal invasive LASER-resection vs. radiotherapy as primary treatment of early glottic cancer. A population-based study with, up to 16 years follow up of survival, rate of laryngectomy and voice function.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rydell Roland, Andreasson Josefine, Gustafsson Baldwin Sara, Clarhed Nathalie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Early glottic cancer can be treated with laser resection or radiotherapy. In an earlier study, we found that voice function after laser resection was inferior to that after radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine if reduced margins at laser resection improved voice function without impairing oncologic results.
METHOD: A total of 268 patients with previously untreated T1-T2 glottic carcinoma were studied. They were primarily treated with either radiotherapy (n = 119) or laser resection (n = 149). Survival, need for additional treatment (radiotherapy and/or total layngectomi) and voice function was compared.
RESULT: Median follow up time was 7 years with range 0.5-16.6. There was no difference in the overall survival (p = .065) or disease-specific survival. (p = .126). After radiotherapy 32/119 patients and after laser resection 57/149 patients had recurrence. Total rate of laryngectomy was 24% in the radiotherapy group, and 8% in the laser resection group (p = .001). Voice analysis (T1A) showed more roughness in the radiotherapy group, otherwise no difference.
CONCLUSIONS: By reducing the surgical margins, we have achieved a better voice function (T1A) but more patients have needed repeated laser excisions and some have also needed supplementary radiotherapy. The risk of laryngectomy and survival were apparently not affected.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine if reduced margins at laser resection improved voice function without impairing oncologic results.
METHOD: A total of 268 patients with previously untreated T1-T2 glottic carcinoma were studied. They were primarily treated with either radiotherapy (n = 119) or laser resection (n = 149). Survival, need for additional treatment (radiotherapy and/or total layngectomi) and voice function was compared.
RESULT: Median follow up time was 7 years with range 0.5-16.6. There was no difference in the overall survival (p = .065) or disease-specific survival. (p = .126). After radiotherapy 32/119 patients and after laser resection 57/149 patients had recurrence. Total rate of laryngectomy was 24% in the radiotherapy group, and 8% in the laser resection group (p = .001). Voice analysis (T1A) showed more roughness in the radiotherapy group, otherwise no difference.
CONCLUSIONS: By reducing the surgical margins, we have achieved a better voice function (T1A) but more patients have needed repeated laser excisions and some have also needed supplementary radiotherapy. The risk of laryngectomy and survival were apparently not affected.