Head & neck · 2023
Transcriptional subtypes of glottic cancer characterized by differential activation of canonical oncogenic programming.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panuganti Bharat A, Carico Christine, Jeyarajan Harishanker, Flagg Mitchell, Tamayo Pablo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data concerning molecular heterogeneity among glottic squamous cell carcinoma, and the clinical implications thereof.
METHODS: Data corresponding to glottic squamous cell carcinoma were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The Onco-GPS computational methodology was levied to derive four patterns of transcriptional activity and three functional subtypes of glottic cancer.
RESULTS: Thirty glottic cancer samples stratified to three distinct oncogenic states (S0-S2) based on a Onco-GPS model containing four transcriptional components (F0-F3). Membership in S2 and association with transcriptional component F0 conveyed an invasive phenotype, with transcriptional activity strongly reflecting EMT programming (including TGF-B and NF-KB signaling). S2 membership also correlated with inferior disease-specific survival (HR 9.027, 95% CI 1.021-79.767), and higher incidences of extracapsular spread and perineural invasion.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a functional taxonomy of glottic cancer, with subtypes demonstrating differential upregulation of canonical oncogenic networks and survival implications.
METHODS: Data corresponding to glottic squamous cell carcinoma were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The Onco-GPS computational methodology was levied to derive four patterns of transcriptional activity and three functional subtypes of glottic cancer.
RESULTS: Thirty glottic cancer samples stratified to three distinct oncogenic states (S0-S2) based on a Onco-GPS model containing four transcriptional components (F0-F3). Membership in S2 and association with transcriptional component F0 conveyed an invasive phenotype, with transcriptional activity strongly reflecting EMT programming (including TGF-B and NF-KB signaling). S2 membership also correlated with inferior disease-specific survival (HR 9.027, 95% CI 1.021-79.767), and higher incidences of extracapsular spread and perineural invasion.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a functional taxonomy of glottic cancer, with subtypes demonstrating differential upregulation of canonical oncogenic networks and survival implications.