Atencion primaria · 1992
[Suitability of the practice of recording only the main health problem in primary care].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bolíbar B, Medina C, Doz J F, de Juan C, Martínez X
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyse if recording only the main health problem (P) can reflect in a valid way the totality of health problems (P+S) cared for and all the actions generated by a consultation.
DESIGN: Using a representative sample of the patients seen at the centre over a three-month period, information on P+S was gathered, P was identified and the actions generated by each one of the problems were recorded. Health problems were codified through CIPSAP-2-D and grouping diagnoses. SITE. General Medicine service in a Primary Care Centre.
PATIENTS AND OTHERS PARTICIPANTS: All the General Medical physicians at the Centre took part in the study by collecting data on the consultations established by the sampling.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Frequency and order among the first 25 P+S and P problems were compared, as was the percentage of secondary problems encountered. Out of 559 consultations examined, Diabetes, Dislepemia and an irritated? Colon stood out as under-represented. Acute infections of the Upper Respiratory Tract, Conjunctivitis and ??Queratitis were over-represented. As for the activity generated, 83.1% corresponded to P, although there was great variability among the problems according to the percentage of secondary problems according to the percentage of secondary problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Recording only the main health problem can be a valid instrument for providing an initial view of problems seen.
DESIGN: Using a representative sample of the patients seen at the centre over a three-month period, information on P+S was gathered, P was identified and the actions generated by each one of the problems were recorded. Health problems were codified through CIPSAP-2-D and grouping diagnoses. SITE. General Medicine service in a Primary Care Centre.
PATIENTS AND OTHERS PARTICIPANTS: All the General Medical physicians at the Centre took part in the study by collecting data on the consultations established by the sampling.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Frequency and order among the first 25 P+S and P problems were compared, as was the percentage of secondary problems encountered. Out of 559 consultations examined, Diabetes, Dislepemia and an irritated? Colon stood out as under-represented. Acute infections of the Upper Respiratory Tract, Conjunctivitis and ??Queratitis were over-represented. As for the activity generated, 83.1% corresponded to P, although there was great variability among the problems according to the percentage of secondary problems according to the percentage of secondary problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Recording only the main health problem can be a valid instrument for providing an initial view of problems seen.