American heart journal · 2025
Self-expanding versus balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in patients with excessive aortic valve cusp calcification.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tomii Daijiro, Alaour Bashir, Heg Dik, Okuno Taishi, Nakase Masaaki, Samim Daryoush, Praz Fabien, Lanz Jonas, Stortecky Stefan, Reineke David, Windecker Stephan, Pilgrim Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Excessive aortic cusp calcification increases the risk of periprocedural complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Differences in device performance in patients with excessive calcification may affect long-term clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To compare periprocedural and long-term outcomes between self-expanding (SEV) and balloon-expandable (BEV) prostheses in patients with excess cusp calcification undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and aortic valve complex calcium volume ≥235 mm³ (on contrast images with Hounsfield unit threshold of 850) who underwent TAVR with either CoreValve/Evolut SEV or SAPIEN BEV from August 2007 to June 2023 were included from a prospective-single center registry. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.
RESULTS: Among 1,345 patients with excessive cusp calcification undergoing TAVR, 271 matched pairs were identified. Procedural success was achieved in >85% of patients with no difference between groups. Annular rupture occurred more frequently with BEV compared to SEV (2.2% vs 0%, P = .030). SEV had a lower transprosthetic gradient (8.0 mmHg vs 11.2 mmHg, P < .001) but higher rates of mild or greater paravalvular regurgitation (69.7% vs 58.1%, P = .008) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (22.6% vs 15.5%, P = .001). At 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (45.1% vs 50.2%, P = .173).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with excessive leaflet calcification undergoing TAVR, BEV had a higher risk of annular rupture, but a lower risk of paravalvular regurgitation, and a lower risk of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to SEV. Mortality was comparable between SEV and BEV throughout 5 years of follow-up.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov. NCT01368250.
OBJECTIVES: To compare periprocedural and long-term outcomes between self-expanding (SEV) and balloon-expandable (BEV) prostheses in patients with excess cusp calcification undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and aortic valve complex calcium volume ≥235 mm³ (on contrast images with Hounsfield unit threshold of 850) who underwent TAVR with either CoreValve/Evolut SEV or SAPIEN BEV from August 2007 to June 2023 were included from a prospective-single center registry. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.
RESULTS: Among 1,345 patients with excessive cusp calcification undergoing TAVR, 271 matched pairs were identified. Procedural success was achieved in >85% of patients with no difference between groups. Annular rupture occurred more frequently with BEV compared to SEV (2.2% vs 0%, P = .030). SEV had a lower transprosthetic gradient (8.0 mmHg vs 11.2 mmHg, P < .001) but higher rates of mild or greater paravalvular regurgitation (69.7% vs 58.1%, P = .008) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (22.6% vs 15.5%, P = .001). At 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (45.1% vs 50.2%, P = .173).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with excessive leaflet calcification undergoing TAVR, BEV had a higher risk of annular rupture, but a lower risk of paravalvular regurgitation, and a lower risk of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to SEV. Mortality was comparable between SEV and BEV throughout 5 years of follow-up.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov. NCT01368250.