World neurosurgery · 2019
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Assessment of Vestibular Schwannomas: Systematic Approach, Methodology, and Pitfalls.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giordano Mario, Samii Amir, Samii Madjid, Nabavi Arya
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of various approaches to extract quantitative measurements of diffusion imaging (i.e., apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) to investigate tumors of the central nervous system. In current studies, the region of interest (ROI) for the quantitative measurements are placed arbitrarily according to morphology. Our aim is to investigate how placement patterns influence the ADC estimation in intracranial tumors.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients affected by vestibular schwannoma were studied using diffusion imaging. ADC values were obtained using different ROI placement methods: segmentation ADC values of the entire volume (vADC), random ADC values were obtained in 10 different ROI points, and a single ROI in the ADC of the internal auditory canal portion of the tumor.
RESULTS: ADC of the internal auditory canal portion of the tumor and vADC differed significantly (P < 0.01). vADC was different between cystic and microcystic schwannomas (P = 0.009) and between cystic and solid schwannomas (P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: The positioning of ROI in these measurements is pivotal. Although "whole tumor volume" measurements represent the largest amount of information, multiple seed points can be used as well. However, there must be multiple seeds and their placement must be reported. ADC can be used as a versatile tool for tumor assessment but must be used judiciously and structured to yield comparable results.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients affected by vestibular schwannoma were studied using diffusion imaging. ADC values were obtained using different ROI placement methods: segmentation ADC values of the entire volume (vADC), random ADC values were obtained in 10 different ROI points, and a single ROI in the ADC of the internal auditory canal portion of the tumor.
RESULTS: ADC of the internal auditory canal portion of the tumor and vADC differed significantly (P < 0.01). vADC was different between cystic and microcystic schwannomas (P = 0.009) and between cystic and solid schwannomas (P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: The positioning of ROI in these measurements is pivotal. Although "whole tumor volume" measurements represent the largest amount of information, multiple seed points can be used as well. However, there must be multiple seeds and their placement must be reported. ADC can be used as a versatile tool for tumor assessment but must be used judiciously and structured to yield comparable results.