MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-74

Медицинская библиотека · BMC research notes · 2014

Worst-case scenario intubation of laryngeal granuloma: a case report.

Nakahira Junko, Sawai Toshiyuki, Matsunami Sayuri, Minami Toshiaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intubation of patients with laryngeal granulomas on the vocal folds are sometimes difficult to manage because of potential airway obstruction. Laryngeal granulomas usually have flexible stalks where they attach to the vocal folds. We report a worst-case scenario of dislocation of the laryngeal granuloma during induction of anaesthesia.

CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of laryngeal granulomas on the posterior vocal fold. A 20-year-old woman had an approximately 10-mm tumour in the laryngeal arytenoid region. Manual ventilation resulted in the tumour lodging in the subglottis and the inflated cuff of the intubation tube successfully returned it to its original position during tube withdrawal. Images were obtained using an Airway Scope® (Hoya-Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) and a video laryngoscope.

CONCLUSION

In our case, the tumour was benign and relatively small in size; therefore, we did not select tracheotomy as an airway management strategy. The case had a granulomatous tumour arising from the posterior vocal folds on the right side, and the tumour was very flexible. To promptly gain control of the airway in such a case using direct laryngoscopy, thus avoiding tracheotomy, other strategies are suggested, such as bronchoscopic visualization with awake or semi-awake intubation.

Для цитирования: Nakahira Junko, Sawai Toshiyuki, Matsunami Sayuri, Minami Toshiaki. Worst-case scenario intubation of laryngeal granuloma: a case report.. BMC research notes. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-74.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.