American journal of hypertension · 2023
Prevalence of Elevated NT-proBNP and its Prognostic Value by Blood Pressure Treatment and Control.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Daya Natalie R, McEvoy John W, Christenson Robert H, Tang Olive, Foti Kathryn, Juraschek Stephen P, Selvin Elizabeth, Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognostic utility of NT-proBNP in the setting of hypertension has not been well-characterized in the general US adult population.
METHODS: We measured NT-proBNP in stored blood samples collected from participants 1 year or older who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In adults 20 years or older without a history of cardiovascular disease, we assessed the prevalence of elevated NT-pro-BNP by blood pressure (BP) treatment and control categories. We examined the extent to which NT-proBNP identifies participants at higher risk for mortality across BP treatment and control categories.
RESULTS: Among US adults without CVD, the prevalence of elevated NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/ml) was 27.2% among those with untreated hypertension, 24.9% among those with treated controlled hypertension, and 43.3% among those with treated uncontrolled hypertension. Over a median follow-up of 17.3 years and after adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors, US adults with treated controlled hypertension and elevated NT-proBNP had increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.79, 2.95) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.83, 95% CI 2.34, 6.29), compared to adults without hypertension and with low levels of NT-proBNP (<125 pg/ml). Across all levels of SBP and irrespective of antihypertensive medication use, elevated NT-proBNP was associated with an increased risk of mortality, compared to low levels of NT-proBNP.
CONCLUSIONS: Among a general population of adults free of CVD, NT-proBNP can provide additional prognostic information within and across categories of BP. Measurement of NT-proBNP may have potential for clinical use to optimize hypertension treatment.
METHODS: We measured NT-proBNP in stored blood samples collected from participants 1 year or older who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In adults 20 years or older without a history of cardiovascular disease, we assessed the prevalence of elevated NT-pro-BNP by blood pressure (BP) treatment and control categories. We examined the extent to which NT-proBNP identifies participants at higher risk for mortality across BP treatment and control categories.
RESULTS: Among US adults without CVD, the prevalence of elevated NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/ml) was 27.2% among those with untreated hypertension, 24.9% among those with treated controlled hypertension, and 43.3% among those with treated uncontrolled hypertension. Over a median follow-up of 17.3 years and after adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors, US adults with treated controlled hypertension and elevated NT-proBNP had increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.79, 2.95) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.83, 95% CI 2.34, 6.29), compared to adults without hypertension and with low levels of NT-proBNP (<125 pg/ml). Across all levels of SBP and irrespective of antihypertensive medication use, elevated NT-proBNP was associated with an increased risk of mortality, compared to low levels of NT-proBNP.
CONCLUSIONS: Among a general population of adults free of CVD, NT-proBNP can provide additional prognostic information within and across categories of BP. Measurement of NT-proBNP may have potential for clinical use to optimize hypertension treatment.