The Journal of surgical research · 2020
Efficacy of Automatic Retention Pressure of a Double-Lumen Tube Cuff: An Artificial Intubation Model.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takahashi Yuki, Tokinaga Yasuyuki, Edanaga Michitaka, Kikuchi Kenichiro, Tada Makoto, Maki Ryunosuke, Yamakage Michiaki, Watanabe Atsushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The movement of a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) out of its appropriate position during thoracic surgery can result in the loss of one-lung ventilation (OLV), especially during pulmonary resection and node dissection. Our study aimed to validate the efficacy of automatic retention pressure control of the DLT bronchial cuff in maintaining OLV in an artificial intubation model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 35-Fr left-sided DLT was intubated to the left main bronchus in an intubation simulator and connected to an anesthesia machine. The inspiratory volume, respiratory rate, and inspiratory-expiratory ratio were set at 500 mL, 12 times/min, and 1:2, respectively. A 1-kg right main bronchial traction in the lateral right was provided after OLV was established. SmartCuff (Smiths Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) was used to maintain cuff pressure. The efficacy of retention pressure with SmartCuff (Group S) and without SmartCuff (Group WS) was compared. The primary outcome was the rate of tidal volume (TV) reduction following bronchial traction in the two groups.
RESULTS: The TVs were 289.8 ± 28.9 mL and 242.8 ± 31.9 mL in Group S and Group WS, respectively (P = 0.003). The rate of TV reduction after bronchial traction was significantly lower in Group S (29 ± 5%) than in Group WS (43 ± 6%) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic retention pressure control of the DLT bronchial cuff improves the rate of TV reduction during right main bronchial traction in an artificial intubation model. Continuous retention cuff pressure may be useful in maintaining OLV during thoracic surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 35-Fr left-sided DLT was intubated to the left main bronchus in an intubation simulator and connected to an anesthesia machine. The inspiratory volume, respiratory rate, and inspiratory-expiratory ratio were set at 500 mL, 12 times/min, and 1:2, respectively. A 1-kg right main bronchial traction in the lateral right was provided after OLV was established. SmartCuff (Smiths Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) was used to maintain cuff pressure. The efficacy of retention pressure with SmartCuff (Group S) and without SmartCuff (Group WS) was compared. The primary outcome was the rate of tidal volume (TV) reduction following bronchial traction in the two groups.
RESULTS: The TVs were 289.8 ± 28.9 mL and 242.8 ± 31.9 mL in Group S and Group WS, respectively (P = 0.003). The rate of TV reduction after bronchial traction was significantly lower in Group S (29 ± 5%) than in Group WS (43 ± 6%) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic retention pressure control of the DLT bronchial cuff improves the rate of TV reduction during right main bronchial traction in an artificial intubation model. Continuous retention cuff pressure may be useful in maintaining OLV during thoracic surgery.