World neurosurgery · 2021
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Due to Rupture of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: Treatments, Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Korai Masaaki, Kanematsu Yasuhisa, Yamaguchi Izumi, Yamaguchi Tadashi, Yamamoto Yuki, Yamamoto Nobuaki, Miyamoto Takeshi, Shimada Kenji, Satomi Junichiro, Hanaoka Mami, Matsuzaki Kazuhito, Satoh Koichi, Takagi Yasushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mortality rate after subarachnoid hemorrhage due to rupture of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs) is high; endovascular coil trapping is the first-line therapy to prevent rerupture. To select optimal treatments, the positional relationship between the VADA and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and the morphology of the contralateral vertebral artery must be considered, and outcome predictors of different treatment methods and their possible complications must be identified.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 44 patients with ruptured VADAs who had undergone endovascular or surgical treatment. VADA morphology was assessed on conventional preoperative angiograms, and VADAs were categorized based on their site in relation to the PICA. VADA site, treatment method, and complications were used to identify prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The sites of the 44 VADAs were PICA-proximal (n = 3), PICA-distal (n = 22), PICA-absent (n = 7), and PICA-involved (n = 12). Treatments included internal coil trapping (n = 30), proximal coil occlusion (n = 5), and stent placement (n = 3); surgical flow alteration via an occipital artery-PICA bypass and ligation at the proximal vertebral artery and the PICA origin was performed in 6 patients. Periprocedural rebleeding was associated with a poor outcome. Internal coil trapping prevented the rerupture of PICA-proximal and PICA-absent VADAs, and flow alteration prevented rerupture of PICA-involved VADAs; there were no complications directly attributable to these procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural rebleeding was a poor prognostic factor. Internal trapping of PICA-proximal and PICA-absent VADAs and flow alteration in PICA-involved VADAs prevented rerupture.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 44 patients with ruptured VADAs who had undergone endovascular or surgical treatment. VADA morphology was assessed on conventional preoperative angiograms, and VADAs were categorized based on their site in relation to the PICA. VADA site, treatment method, and complications were used to identify prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The sites of the 44 VADAs were PICA-proximal (n = 3), PICA-distal (n = 22), PICA-absent (n = 7), and PICA-involved (n = 12). Treatments included internal coil trapping (n = 30), proximal coil occlusion (n = 5), and stent placement (n = 3); surgical flow alteration via an occipital artery-PICA bypass and ligation at the proximal vertebral artery and the PICA origin was performed in 6 patients. Periprocedural rebleeding was associated with a poor outcome. Internal coil trapping prevented the rerupture of PICA-proximal and PICA-absent VADAs, and flow alteration prevented rerupture of PICA-involved VADAs; there were no complications directly attributable to these procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural rebleeding was a poor prognostic factor. Internal trapping of PICA-proximal and PICA-absent VADAs and flow alteration in PICA-involved VADAs prevented rerupture.