Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024
Impact of adipocytes on ultrasound evaluation of parathyroid adenomas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujimoto Tomoko, Hirokawa Mitsuyoshi, Suzuki Ayana, Oshita Maki, Yamaoka Hiroyuki, Fujishima Makoto, Onoda Naoyoshi, Miyauchi Akira, Akamizu Takashi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Parathyroid lipoadenomas are difficult to recognize preoperatively; hence, they may remain undetected. Difficulty in recognition is thought to be due to the adipocytes present in the tumor. This study aimed to clarify the impact of adipocytes as a component of parathyroid adenomas on ultrasound evaluation.
METHODS: Eighteen parathyroid adenoma cases, in which the adipose tissue accounted for more than 10% of the tumors, were included in this study. Of these, five were consistent with lipoadenomas. Twenty-five consecutive patients with parathyroid adenoma without adipocytes were used as controls.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography revealed a lipoadenoma detection rate of 20.0%. This increased to 80.0% at re-examinations performed after obtaining information from other imaging modalities. Compared with parathyroid adenoma cases with no adipocytes or few adipocytes, the frequencies of ill-defined margins, iso- and/or hyperechogenicity, heterogeneous consistency with a two-tone pattern, poor vascular flow, no polar artery, and no hyperechoic line were significantly higher in parathyroid lipoadenoma cases. The hyperechoic and isoechoic areas in tumors with a two-tone pattern correspond to adipocyte- and parathyroid cell-rich areas, respectively. The lipoadenoma tumor sizes measured using ultrasound tended to be smaller than the actual sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic ultrasound findings of lipoadenomas were clearly different from those of parathyroid adenomas with or without adipocytes. We believe that our findings may contribute to an increased detection rate of lipoadenomas and allow us to consider them in the differential diagnosis.
METHODS: Eighteen parathyroid adenoma cases, in which the adipose tissue accounted for more than 10% of the tumors, were included in this study. Of these, five were consistent with lipoadenomas. Twenty-five consecutive patients with parathyroid adenoma without adipocytes were used as controls.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography revealed a lipoadenoma detection rate of 20.0%. This increased to 80.0% at re-examinations performed after obtaining information from other imaging modalities. Compared with parathyroid adenoma cases with no adipocytes or few adipocytes, the frequencies of ill-defined margins, iso- and/or hyperechogenicity, heterogeneous consistency with a two-tone pattern, poor vascular flow, no polar artery, and no hyperechoic line were significantly higher in parathyroid lipoadenoma cases. The hyperechoic and isoechoic areas in tumors with a two-tone pattern correspond to adipocyte- and parathyroid cell-rich areas, respectively. The lipoadenoma tumor sizes measured using ultrasound tended to be smaller than the actual sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic ultrasound findings of lipoadenomas were clearly different from those of parathyroid adenomas with or without adipocytes. We believe that our findings may contribute to an increased detection rate of lipoadenomas and allow us to consider them in the differential diagnosis.