Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes following vascular-related and traumatic spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have noted similar outcomes between vascular-related spinal cord injury (VR-SCI) and those with traumatic SCI (T-SCI), despite significant difference in their demographics and clinical presentation (age, level of injury (LOI), and degree of incompleteness).

OBJECTIVES

To review demographic and clinical presentation of VR-SCI and to compare outcomes with a matched group with T-SCI. Design Analysis of 10-year prospective data collection including 30 consecutive patients admitted to an SCI rehabilitation unit with VR-SCI and comparison with 573 patients with T-SCI. Outcomes were further analyzed comparing VR-SCI to T-SCI (n=30), matched for age, LOI, and ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) Impairment Scale (AIS).

SETTING

A level 1 tertiary university trauma center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional independence measure (FIM) score changes from admission to discharge. Secondary outcome measures included admission and discharge FIM scores, FIM efficiency, rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Overall, individuals with VR-SCI were more likely (P<0.0001) to be older (mean age 57.2 vs. 40.0 years) and have paraplegia (87 vs. 48%) than those with T-SCI. Common etiologies for VR-SCI were post-surgical complication (43%), arteriovenous malformation (17%), aortic dissection (13%), and systemic hypotension (13%). Common region of injury and AIS classification in VR-SCI was thoracic (73%) and AIS C (33%). Common SCI-related complications in VR-SCI included neurogenic bowel/bladder (93%), urinary tract infection (73%), pain (67%), pressure ulcers (47%), and spasticity (20%). Matched-group outcome comparisons did not reveal significant differences in FIM change, FIM efficiency, LOS, or disposition between VR-SCI and T-SCI.

CONCLUSION

VR-SCI leads to significant disability and is associated with common secondary SCI complications as well as medical co-morbidities. This study notes differing demographic and injury characteristics between VR-SCI and T-SCI groups. However, when matched for these differences, rehabilitation functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.