Zhongguo ji sheng chong xue yu ji sheng chong bing za zhi = Chinese journal of parasitology & parasitic diseases · 1999
[Preliminary studies on microwave irradiation ELISA for diagnosis of Schistosomiasis japonica].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gu Q, Zhang H, Zhu S, Xu W
Аннотация
AIM: To explore a fast and highly efficient method for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica.
METHODS: Using microwave irradiation ELISA (MWI-ELISA) and fast-ELISA to detect specific antibodies in sera from 118 cases with schistosomiasis japonica, 61 healthy individuals and 12 paragonimiasis cases.
RESULTS: The positive rates of schistosomiasis cases were 88.1% (104/118) by MWI-ELISA and 91.5% (108/118) by fast-ELISA, respectively (chi 2 = 0.74, P > 0.05). The false positive reaction of healthy individuals was found in 2 cases(3.3%) by MWI-ELISA and 1 case (1.6%) by fast-ELISA, respectively (chi 2 = 0.34, P > 0.05). No false positive reaction was found in paragonimiasis cases.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the two tests were similar, however, MWI-ELISA was faster than fast-ELISA.
METHODS: Using microwave irradiation ELISA (MWI-ELISA) and fast-ELISA to detect specific antibodies in sera from 118 cases with schistosomiasis japonica, 61 healthy individuals and 12 paragonimiasis cases.
RESULTS: The positive rates of schistosomiasis cases were 88.1% (104/118) by MWI-ELISA and 91.5% (108/118) by fast-ELISA, respectively (chi 2 = 0.74, P > 0.05). The false positive reaction of healthy individuals was found in 2 cases(3.3%) by MWI-ELISA and 1 case (1.6%) by fast-ELISA, respectively (chi 2 = 0.34, P > 0.05). No false positive reaction was found in paragonimiasis cases.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the two tests were similar, however, MWI-ELISA was faster than fast-ELISA.