Analysis of photorefractive keratectomy patients who have not had PRK in their second eye.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is performed at the Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC) with a minimum period of 3 months between first and second eye treatment. During this period, iatrogenic anisometropia may occur, which can lead to significant visual disability. We analyzed the reasons why some patients delayed or did not receive PRK treatment to their second eye. The reasons for originally electing PRK, and the expectations these patients had, were also studied.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between January 1992 and September 1993, 341 patients underwent PRK at SNEC. Of these, 86 (25.2%) did not receive PRK to their fellow eye within 1 year of follow-up and were recruited into the study. Data were collected retrospectively using a standardized questionnaire, and objective clinical data were obtained from the case records. Sixty-eight patients (79%) responded.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (14.9%) had not undergone PRK at the conclusion of the study (mean follow-up = 31 months). Of these, 36 were due to dissatisfaction with the results of the procedure. Symptoms relating to hypermetropia (15 patients) and symptoms of glare and halos were the main reasons which discouraged patients from receiving PRK in their fellow eye. Seventeen of the 51 patients (33.3%) who did not have PRK performed in the second eye were overcorrected to hypermetropia, as opposed to 9 out of 255 patients (3.5%) who had PRK in the second eye (P < 0.001, chi-square test). Seventy-five percent of the patients who did not undergo PRK in the second eye expected postlaser unaided vision to be equal to prelaser best corrected vision; however, only 23% of these patients achieved this.

CONCLUSION

Hypermetropia, glare and halos are significant causes of patient dissatisfaction after PRK. Patients who request PRK should be advised against harboring unrealistically high expectations for the procedure.