Acta oto-laryngologica · 2009
TORP vs round window implant for hearing restoration of patients with extensive ossicular chain defect.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Colletti Vittorio, Carner Marco, Colletti Liliana
Аннотация
CONCLUSIONS: Round window implant (RWI) with a floating mass transducer (FMT) may be suggested as the first choice in hearing rehabilitation for patients with chronic otitis media (COM) and extensive destruction of the ossicular chain.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pros and cons of the total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) vs the RWI in restoration of hearing in patients with COM.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with bilateral moderate to severe mixed or conductive hearing loss from COM without cholesteatoma and bilateral ossicular chain erosion (footplate residual) were alternately assigned to a titanium-TORP (T-TORP) and to RWI with the FMT of the Medel Vibrant Soundbridge (MVBS) located onto the RW niche. The therapeutic efficiency, preoperative vs postoperative air-conduction gain and speech recognition were investigated for the two groups and statistically analyzed at 36 months postoperatively. The following postoperative anatomic conditions were also evaluated for the two groups: 1) recurrence of infection, 2) retraction pocket, 3) extrusion rate, and 4) displacement of the prosthesis.
RESULTS: Good functional results and stability at 36 months were obtained with both procedures. The extrusion rates for T-TORP were low. So far no extrusion has been observed for RWI. Hearing results were statistically much better for RWI vs T-TORP for all investigated parameters.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pros and cons of the total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) vs the RWI in restoration of hearing in patients with COM.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with bilateral moderate to severe mixed or conductive hearing loss from COM without cholesteatoma and bilateral ossicular chain erosion (footplate residual) were alternately assigned to a titanium-TORP (T-TORP) and to RWI with the FMT of the Medel Vibrant Soundbridge (MVBS) located onto the RW niche. The therapeutic efficiency, preoperative vs postoperative air-conduction gain and speech recognition were investigated for the two groups and statistically analyzed at 36 months postoperatively. The following postoperative anatomic conditions were also evaluated for the two groups: 1) recurrence of infection, 2) retraction pocket, 3) extrusion rate, and 4) displacement of the prosthesis.
RESULTS: Good functional results and stability at 36 months were obtained with both procedures. The extrusion rates for T-TORP were low. So far no extrusion has been observed for RWI. Hearing results were statistically much better for RWI vs T-TORP for all investigated parameters.