Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2003
Macroprolactinaemia associated with prolactin adenoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mounier Chantal, Trouillas Jacqueline, Claustrat Bruno, Duthel Robert, Estour Bruno
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Macroprolactinaemia, defined as hyperprolactinaemia with a predominance of, or only, the big big prolactin (bbPRL) isoform, is considered idiopathic and poorly symptomatic. Since its association with a PRL adenoma is poorly documented, we examined a series of 13 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinaemia for the presence of macroprolactinaemia.
METHODS: From a series of 36 patients with hyperprolactinaemia studied for PRL isoforms, we selected 13 with hyperprolactinaemia and a prolactinoma, and divided them into two groups on the basis of the predominant PRL isoform, the large PRL group (five patients), with a predominance of the big big PRL isoform, and the monomeric PRL (mPRL) group (eight patients), with a predominance of the mPRL isoform. Plasma PRL concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay, while plasma PRL heterogeneity was studied by gel filtration chromatography. The plasma autoantibody-bound PRL and the histology of the tumours were also studied.
RESULTS: Macroprolactinaemia was seen in five out of the 13 patients with a PRL adenoma. The clinical and biological characteristics of the groups with and without macroprolactinaemia were similar. In the large PRL group, no evidence for anti-PRL autoantibodies was found and the prolactinomas were either typical or exhibited unusual aggregates of immunoreactive PRL deposits, the latter suggesting the tumoral origin of these large forms.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PRL adenoma may be associated with macroprolactinaemia.
METHODS: From a series of 36 patients with hyperprolactinaemia studied for PRL isoforms, we selected 13 with hyperprolactinaemia and a prolactinoma, and divided them into two groups on the basis of the predominant PRL isoform, the large PRL group (five patients), with a predominance of the big big PRL isoform, and the monomeric PRL (mPRL) group (eight patients), with a predominance of the mPRL isoform. Plasma PRL concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay, while plasma PRL heterogeneity was studied by gel filtration chromatography. The plasma autoantibody-bound PRL and the histology of the tumours were also studied.
RESULTS: Macroprolactinaemia was seen in five out of the 13 patients with a PRL adenoma. The clinical and biological characteristics of the groups with and without macroprolactinaemia were similar. In the large PRL group, no evidence for anti-PRL autoantibodies was found and the prolactinomas were either typical or exhibited unusual aggregates of immunoreactive PRL deposits, the latter suggesting the tumoral origin of these large forms.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PRL adenoma may be associated with macroprolactinaemia.