MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/opx.0000000000001653

Медицинская библиотека · Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2021

Case Report: Crying Blood.

Idowu Oluwatobi O, Kaidonis Georgia, Husain Sameera, Winn Bryan J

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

SIGNIFICANCE: Hemolacria (bloody tears) is a rare clinical presentation with varied underlying etiologies. Thorough clinical evaluation is essential to diagnosis and management.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report unilateral hemolacria in a known contact lens wearer with an occult, palpebral, conjunctival pyogenic granuloma and review the literature.

CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old female contact lens wearer presented to the clinic after three episodes of sudden painless bloody tears from the right eye. She was referred to the oculoplastic clinic for evaluation. On everting her right upper lid, a fleshy, nontender, ovoid, pedunculated mass was found attached to the palpebral conjunctiva of the right, nasal, upper tarsus. Surgical excision was performed in the office, and pathological examination of the lesion was consistent with pyogenic granuloma.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral hemolacria should raise clinical suspicion for a hidden conjunctival lesion such as pyogenic granuloma, although other more sinister causes of hemolacria must also be considered. Thorough evaluation including eyelid eversion is critical in identifying and managing occult conjunctival lesions.

Для цитирования: Idowu Oluwatobi O, Kaidonis Georgia, Husain Sameera, Winn Bryan J. Case Report: Crying Blood.. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000001653.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.