Translational vision science & technology · 2026
Circulating Inflammatory Proteins and Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Mendelian Randomization and Bioinformatics-Based Investigation.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Dan, Li Gang, Cui Xinhan, Zhang Jing
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is an age-related ocular disorder characterized by gradual loss of corneal endothelial cells, with growing evidence implicating chronic inflammation in its pathogenesis. This study aims to investigate causal relationships between circulating inflammatory proteins (IPs) and FECD.
METHODS: We performed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using IP summary statistics (N = 14,824) and FECD data from the GWAS Catalog (N = 448,712). Key findings were then validated in two independent FECD datasets and subjected to meta-analysis. Differential gene expression profiles were explored using GEO datasets and an in vitro assay.
RESULTS: The initial MR analysis identified potential causal links for three IPs. Only TNFRSF11B demonstrated a robust risk effect confirmed by a subsequent cross-cohorts meta-analysis (odds ratio = 1.193; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-1.369; P-meta = 0.01212). In contrast, the associations for MIP-1β and NRTN were limited by marginal statistical significance and inconsistent replication directions, respectively. Transcriptomic profiling further confirmed elevated TNFRSF11B expression in FECD-affected tissues. TNFRSF11B expression was also increased in human corneal endothelial cells upon H2O2 exposure in vitro.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the involvement of inflammatory pathways in FECD pathogenesis and identifies genetically predicted TNFRSF11B levels as a robust risk factor. Supported by consistent meta-analysis and expression validation, TNFRSF11B emerges as a high-priority candidate biomarker and a plausible therapeutic target worthy of further investigation.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Our findings advance the understanding of the genetic architecture of inflammatory mechanisms in FECD and provide a strong rationale for exploring TNFRSF11B inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy.
METHODS: We performed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using IP summary statistics (N = 14,824) and FECD data from the GWAS Catalog (N = 448,712). Key findings were then validated in two independent FECD datasets and subjected to meta-analysis. Differential gene expression profiles were explored using GEO datasets and an in vitro assay.
RESULTS: The initial MR analysis identified potential causal links for three IPs. Only TNFRSF11B demonstrated a robust risk effect confirmed by a subsequent cross-cohorts meta-analysis (odds ratio = 1.193; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-1.369; P-meta = 0.01212). In contrast, the associations for MIP-1β and NRTN were limited by marginal statistical significance and inconsistent replication directions, respectively. Transcriptomic profiling further confirmed elevated TNFRSF11B expression in FECD-affected tissues. TNFRSF11B expression was also increased in human corneal endothelial cells upon H2O2 exposure in vitro.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the involvement of inflammatory pathways in FECD pathogenesis and identifies genetically predicted TNFRSF11B levels as a robust risk factor. Supported by consistent meta-analysis and expression validation, TNFRSF11B emerges as a high-priority candidate biomarker and a plausible therapeutic target worthy of further investigation.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Our findings advance the understanding of the genetic architecture of inflammatory mechanisms in FECD and provide a strong rationale for exploring TNFRSF11B inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy.