Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
Persistent atrial fibrillation with left atrial low-voltage area: who benefit from additional modification?
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Hengzhi, Chen Ning, Bian Qiuheng, Yuan Mingchuan, Yang Gang, Shen Youmei, Chen Hongwu, Ju Weizhu, Li Mingfang, Gu Kai, Wu Nan, Liu Hailei, Chen Minglong
Аннотация
AIMS: The presence of low-voltage areas (LVAs) is associated with increased recurrence rate following ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, the benefit of additional LVA modification remains controversial. This substudy of the STABLE-SR-II trial aims to explore the factors that influence the benefit of additional LVA ablation for PeAF patients with LVAs.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In the STABLE-SR-II trial, PeAF patients with de novo ablation were randomized to receive either circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI, CPVI-alone group) or CPVI plus LVA ablation (CPVI-plus group). Patients with LVAs were included and analyzed in this substudy. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmias 18 months after a single ablation procedure. LVAs were detected in 133 out of 276 PeAF patients (48%). Age and LVA burden were potential factors influencing the relative success of additional LVA ablation compared with CPVI alone in the univariable analysis. In multi-adjusted models, significant benefit from additional LVA ablation was found in patients aged ≥65 years [n = 50, hazard ratio (HR) 0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.83] or with LVA burden ≥ 15% (n = 18, HR 0.01, 95% CI: 0-0.44). LVA burden ≥15% was observed in 10 of 50 patients aged ≥65 years (20%) and in 8 of 83 patients aged <65 years (10%). Combined subgroup analysis demonstrated that LVA ablation was particularly beneficial for patients aged ≥65 years, regardless of LVA burden.
CONCLUSION: LVA ablation following CPVI may provide additional benefits for older PeAF patients (≥65 years) in the first procedure.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03448562 [CPVI Alone Versus CPVI Plus Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the LA During SR for the Treatment of Non-PAF (STABLE-SR_II)].
METHODS AND RESULTS: In the STABLE-SR-II trial, PeAF patients with de novo ablation were randomized to receive either circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI, CPVI-alone group) or CPVI plus LVA ablation (CPVI-plus group). Patients with LVAs were included and analyzed in this substudy. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmias 18 months after a single ablation procedure. LVAs were detected in 133 out of 276 PeAF patients (48%). Age and LVA burden were potential factors influencing the relative success of additional LVA ablation compared with CPVI alone in the univariable analysis. In multi-adjusted models, significant benefit from additional LVA ablation was found in patients aged ≥65 years [n = 50, hazard ratio (HR) 0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.83] or with LVA burden ≥ 15% (n = 18, HR 0.01, 95% CI: 0-0.44). LVA burden ≥15% was observed in 10 of 50 patients aged ≥65 years (20%) and in 8 of 83 patients aged <65 years (10%). Combined subgroup analysis demonstrated that LVA ablation was particularly beneficial for patients aged ≥65 years, regardless of LVA burden.
CONCLUSION: LVA ablation following CPVI may provide additional benefits for older PeAF patients (≥65 years) in the first procedure.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03448562 [CPVI Alone Versus CPVI Plus Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the LA During SR for the Treatment of Non-PAF (STABLE-SR_II)].