m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Kardiologia polska · 2024

Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with index-guided ablation compared to very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective single-center study.

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Peller Michał, Dźwinacka Julia, Krzowski Bartosz, Marchel Michał, Maciejewski Cezary, Mitrzak Karolina, Opolski Grzegorz, Grabowski Marcin, Balsam Paweł, Lodziński Piotr

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation treatment. First-pass pulmonary vein isolation is defined as isolation achieved with only a single lesion in every part of the isolation lines.

AIMS: The primary aim was to assess the frequency of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation after ablation index-guided (AI) and very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. The secondary goals were to detect areas of additional lesions and the correlation between them and used methods and to access efficiency of the procedure.

METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we included 105 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Based on the operators' decisions, 51 patients underwent AI-guided, and 54 patients underwent vHPSD ablation. The ipsilateral pulmonary veins were divided into four areas, and the anatomical region and several additional applications were evaluated.

RESULTS: Bilateral first-pass pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 34.3% of patients, with no significant difference between AI-guided and vHPSD ablation (37.0% vs. 31.4%; P = 0.68). In both groups, the most common region of additional applications was the posterior part of the right-sided carina (AI: 25.5% [13/51] vs. vHPSD: 25.9% [14/54]; P = 0.89). There was a significant difference (P = 0.049) between techniques in the highest frequency of additional applications in the left-sided pulmonary veins: in the anterior part of the carina (AI: 15.7% vs. vHPSD: 7.4%) and the posterior part of the carina (AI: 5.9% vs. vHSPD: 22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS: Lesions made with AI-guided and vHPSD protocols differed in areas of additional applications, which was most significant in the left-sided pulmonary veins.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты