Clinical nuclear medicine · 2022
Fully Automatic Quantitative Measurement of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Thymic Epithelial Tumors Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han Sangwon, Oh Jungsu S, Kim Yong-Il, Seo Seung Yeon, Lee Geun Dong, Park Min-Jae, Choi Sehoon, Kim Hyeong Ryul, Kim Yong-Hee, Kim Dong Kwan, Park Seung-Il, Ryu Jin-Sook
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL)-based segmentation algorithm for automatic measurement of metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), comparable performance to manual volumes of interest.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 186 consecutive patients with resectable TETs and preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled (145 thymomas, 41 thymic carcinomas). A quasi-3D U-net architecture was trained to resemble ground-truth volumes of interest. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient. Agreements between manual and DL-based automated extraction of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and 63 radiomics features were evaluated via concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and linear regression slopes. Diagnostic and prognostic values were compared in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for thymic carcinoma and hazards ratios (HRs) for freedom from recurrence.
RESULTS: The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.83 ± 0.34. Automatically measured SUVmax (slope, 0.97; CCC, 0.92), MTV (slope, 0.94; CCC, 0.96), and TLG (slope, 0.96; CCC, 0.96) were in good agreement with manual measurements. The mean CCC and slopes were 0.88 ± 0.06 and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively, for the radiomics parameters. Automatically measured SUVmax, MTV, and TLG showed good diagnostic accuracy for thymic carcinoma (AUCs: SUVmax, 0.95; MTV, 0.85; TLG, 0.87) and significant prognostic value (HRs: SUVmax, 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48]; MTV, 2.11 [1.09-4.06]; TLG, 1.90 [1.12-3.23]). No significant differences in the AUCs or HRs were found between automatic and manual measurements for any of the metabolic parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Our DL-based model provides comparable segmentation performance and metabolic parameter values to manual measurements in TETs.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 186 consecutive patients with resectable TETs and preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled (145 thymomas, 41 thymic carcinomas). A quasi-3D U-net architecture was trained to resemble ground-truth volumes of interest. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient. Agreements between manual and DL-based automated extraction of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and 63 radiomics features were evaluated via concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and linear regression slopes. Diagnostic and prognostic values were compared in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for thymic carcinoma and hazards ratios (HRs) for freedom from recurrence.
RESULTS: The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.83 ± 0.34. Automatically measured SUVmax (slope, 0.97; CCC, 0.92), MTV (slope, 0.94; CCC, 0.96), and TLG (slope, 0.96; CCC, 0.96) were in good agreement with manual measurements. The mean CCC and slopes were 0.88 ± 0.06 and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively, for the radiomics parameters. Automatically measured SUVmax, MTV, and TLG showed good diagnostic accuracy for thymic carcinoma (AUCs: SUVmax, 0.95; MTV, 0.85; TLG, 0.87) and significant prognostic value (HRs: SUVmax, 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48]; MTV, 2.11 [1.09-4.06]; TLG, 1.90 [1.12-3.23]). No significant differences in the AUCs or HRs were found between automatic and manual measurements for any of the metabolic parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Our DL-based model provides comparable segmentation performance and metabolic parameter values to manual measurements in TETs.