Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kodavoor Shreesha Kumar, Soundarya B, Dandapani Ramamurthy
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare horizontal and vertical split conjunctival autograft technique in the management of double head pterygium.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 96 and 99 eyes with double head pterygia that underwent horizontal (Group 1) and vertical (Group 2) split conjunctival autografting, respectively. Comparison of recurrence rates and other complications was done.
RESULTS: Recurrence was seen in 5.2% and 4% of the eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P > 0.05). Other complications like subconjunctival hemorrhage, graft edema, graft retraction, granuloma, and graft loss were also comparable among the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Both the techniques provide good results with comparable efficacy in terms of rates of recurrence and complication profiles.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 96 and 99 eyes with double head pterygia that underwent horizontal (Group 1) and vertical (Group 2) split conjunctival autografting, respectively. Comparison of recurrence rates and other complications was done.
RESULTS: Recurrence was seen in 5.2% and 4% of the eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P > 0.05). Other complications like subconjunctival hemorrhage, graft edema, graft retraction, granuloma, and graft loss were also comparable among the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Both the techniques provide good results with comparable efficacy in terms of rates of recurrence and complication profiles.