MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ojo.ojo_69_2017

Медицинская библиотека · Oman journal of ophthalmology · 2019

Long-term analysis of an unconventional way of doing double-head pterygium excision.

Kodavoor Shreesha Kumar, Tiwari Nitin Narendra, Ramamurthy Dandapani

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: The aim of the study is to describe an unconventional technique of vertically split conjunctival autograft (CAG) for primary double-head pterygium and its long-term outcome.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This was a retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series of 95 eyes of 95 patients, who underwent vertical, split CAG surgery without maintaining limbus-limbus orientation for primary double-head pterygium from January 2013 to January 2017. All patients were reviewed for recurrence in their follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 14.12 ± 9.42 months. The baseline characteristics included 44 males and 51 females, with a mean age of 56.24 ± 10.03 years. The only significant complication was recurrence rate of 2.10% (2 eyes out of 95). The most common secondary outcome was graft edema (36.84%, 35 eyes out of 95), which resolved without any intervention. The other outcomes such as graft retraction (12.63%), Tenon's granuloma (1.05%), and subconjunctival hemorrhage (34.73%) were also recorded.

CONCLUSION

Unconventional vertical split CAG without maintaining limbus-limbus orientation has convincing results in treating double-head pterygium with lower recurrence rate.

Для цитирования: Kodavoor Shreesha Kumar, Tiwari Nitin Narendra, Ramamurthy Dandapani. Long-term analysis of an unconventional way of doing double-head pterygium excision.. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2019. DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_69_2017.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.