Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice · 2026
Rethinking compression: expanding decongestive therapy with innovative garment solutions.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ehmann Suzie, Davis Sandi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Access to skilled lymphedema care is increasingly limited due to workforce shortages, financial constraints, and logistical barriers. Although compression bandaging remains the standard for the intensive phase and compression garments for maintenance, their complexity and reliance on trained clinicians pose challenges for many patients. This article explores the use of an elastic nighttime garment (ENG) and an adjustable wrap device (AWD) in both phases to optimize outcomes. The ENG used in this analysis is a specific low-profile, elastic, lymphatic alternating pressure profile-based design. The AWD used is constructed using overlapping, knitted, short-stretch bands rather than laminate textile.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical viability of a dual-layer, patient-managed compression system that combines an ENG with an AWD as an alternative to traditional bandaging during the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and as a tool for long-term maintenance.
METHODS: This prospective case-based analysis draws from 5 representative patients with complex lymphedema presentations and barriers to conventional CDT. Each case details diagnosis, intervention protocol, and outcomes using the dual-layer system. Compression combinations were tailored to individual needs, with emphasis on self-management, mobility, and wound care compatibility.
RESULTS: All patients achieved measurable limb volume reduction, improved adherence, and enhanced independence. The system facilitated transition to custom garments, reduced clinic visit frequency, and supported wound healing and mobility in diverse clinical scenarios.
CONCLUSION: The dual-layer ENG plus AWD system offers a scalable, evidence-informed alternative to traditional compression bandaging. It enhances access, supports patient autonomy, and bridges intensive therapy with sustainable self-management, which is particularly valuable in underserved and resource-limited settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical viability of a dual-layer, patient-managed compression system that combines an ENG with an AWD as an alternative to traditional bandaging during the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and as a tool for long-term maintenance.
METHODS: This prospective case-based analysis draws from 5 representative patients with complex lymphedema presentations and barriers to conventional CDT. Each case details diagnosis, intervention protocol, and outcomes using the dual-layer system. Compression combinations were tailored to individual needs, with emphasis on self-management, mobility, and wound care compatibility.
RESULTS: All patients achieved measurable limb volume reduction, improved adherence, and enhanced independence. The system facilitated transition to custom garments, reduced clinic visit frequency, and supported wound healing and mobility in diverse clinical scenarios.
CONCLUSION: The dual-layer ENG plus AWD system offers a scalable, evidence-informed alternative to traditional compression bandaging. It enhances access, supports patient autonomy, and bridges intensive therapy with sustainable self-management, which is particularly valuable in underserved and resource-limited settings.