MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153923

Медицинская библиотека · Anais brasileiros de dermatologia · 2015

Lichen planopilaris epidemiology: a retrospective study of 80 cases.

Soares Vanessa Cristina, Mulinari-Brenner Fabiane, Souza Tatiane Elen de

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lichen planopilaris is a frequent presentation of primary cicatricial alopecia. Scalp distribution characterizes the main clinical presentations: classic lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia and Graham-Little Piccardi-Lassueur Syndrome (GLPLS).

OBJECTIVE

Description of the clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological findings of Lichen planopilaris in public and private practices.

METHOD: A retrospective observational study was performed by reviewing medical records of patients with lichen planopilaris.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included, 73 (91,25%) were female. Prototype II was seen in 53 (66,25%) patients. Classic lichen planopilaris was seen in 62,5% of the cases. Frontal fibrosing alopecia was seen in 31% of the patients and only one patient presented Graham-Little Piccardi-Lassueur Syndrome (GLPLS). Scalp lesions were scattered throughout the scalp in 47 (58,75%) of the patients, while 24 (30%) presented mainly central scalp lesions, 29 (36,25%) presented marginal lesions and only 4 (5%) patents had vertex lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical presentation of Lichen planopilaris varies. To recognize the heterogeneity of the clinical appearance in lichen planopilaris is important for differential diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Soares Vanessa Cristina, Mulinari-Brenner Fabiane, Souza Tatiane Elen de. Lichen planopilaris epidemiology: a retrospective study of 80 cases.. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. 2015. DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153923.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.