MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.08.079

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology · 2007

Intracranial leptomeningeal metastasis from thymic carcinoma: case report and review.

Thompson Eric M, Sather Michael D, Reyes Christine A, Long Douglas J

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Thymic carcinoma is an uncommon malignant tumor of the anterior mediastinum. Meningeal metastasis from this type of neoplasm is extraordinarily rare and the prognosis is abysmal.

CASE DESCRIPTION: This article presents the case of a 45-year-old man with known metastatic thymic carcinoma who presented with intractable headaches. An MRI scan was highly suggestive of a meningioma, and it was initially suspected that this patient had 2 primary tumors. Surgical resection of the mass both demonstrated a metastatic thymic lesion and ameliorated the patient's quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The authors report a case of intracranial meningeal metastasis from a lymphoepithelioma-like poorly differentiated metastatic thymic carcinoma, which was treated by resection and WBRT. A review of the current literature revealed no other cases of this uncommon alhistologic subtype of thymic carcinoma metastatic to the cranium. The incidence, histologic classification of subtypes, and treatment are discussed. This case also illustrates the importance of maintaining a high degree of suspicion for a metastasis in patients with known primary malignancy who present with an MRI highly suspicious for meningioma.

Для цитирования: Thompson Eric M, Sather Michael D, Reyes Christine A, Long Douglas J. Intracranial leptomeningeal metastasis from thymic carcinoma: case report and review.. Surgical neurology. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.08.079.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.