MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta neurologica Taiwanica · 2014

Spontaneous vertebral artery dissection with thunderclap headache: a case report and review of the literature.

Hsu Yung-Chu, Sung Sheng-Feng

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an important and under-recognized etiology of stroke in young patients. No clinical symptoms or signs appear to be specific for VAD. This report describes a representative patient and reviews the headache pattern and imaging findings commonly noted in VAD to help with the early diagnosis of VAD.

CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old female presented with severe right posterior neck pain and vertigo followed closely by thunderclap headache that was confirmed as right VAD (V4 segment) with delayed right dorsal medullary infarction two days later. Her headache, vertigo, and truncal ataxia were completely improved one week later.

CONCLUSION

The most common neuroimaging findings of VAD were vertebral artery stenosis, followed by the string and pearls sign, arterial dilation, arterial occlusion, and the less common but most characteristic features of pseudoaneurysm formation, double lumen, and intimal flap. Pain in VAD mostly occurred in the ipsilateral posterior occipitonuchal region, with throbbing features in 50- 60% of the patients. Only one fifth of patients with VAD present with a thunderclap pattern. In stroke among young patients or stroke with pain in the head and neck, angiography study of the craniocervical artery is highly recommended.

Для цитирования: Hsu Yung-Chu, Sung Sheng-Feng. Spontaneous vertebral artery dissection with thunderclap headache: a case report and review of the literature.. Acta neurologica Taiwanica. 2014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.